1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLEGan [10]
3 years ago
12

Don't type anything in answer box.

History
2 answers:
andre [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Lots of points

Explanation:

Oksi-84 [34.3K]3 years ago
4 0
The good things for him was that he could offer resources and other valuables to countries to join him since they didn't have them. But the Great Depression also made it hard for Germany to manage to get enough resources during the war. So in answer to your question I don't think that Hitler could've gained any more power because pretty much the whole world was against him and other countries would have more resources to supply themselves (and allies) for the war. Hope this helps! :)
You might be interested in
How did nationalism, imperialism, and militarism help raise tensions in Europe?
Goryan [66]

Answer:

I hope this helped. I am sorry if you get this wrong.

Explanation:

Militarism: A clique of militaristic officers (don't worry) and politicians had gained control over a lot of countries in the years because of WWII. Which is including Hitler, Stalin and even Mussolini. There aggressive tactics had forced neighboring countries to either one appease them or either two fight back.

Imperialism: European nation's sense of rivalry and even mistrust of one and another depended as they competed for colonies in Asia and even Africa militarism (which is the policy of glorifying military power and also keeping a army always prepared for war no matter what.

Nationalism: Nationalism had increased among European nations because every other nation had thought they were always the best and then disagreed with the policies all the other nations had for their nation.

6 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer. Which of the following is a critique of the Trans-Pacific Partnership? A. It will reduce competition
Yanka [14]

    B is the correct answer because the Trans-Pacific Partnership makes trade with low cost manufacturing countries easier; it reduces profits of the America which will cause job cuts and increase unemployment in the United States.

Hope this helps :)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
. Hinduism and Islam are two of the world's most widely practiced religions. Followers of these religions interacted a great dea
fenix001 [56]
Yes i dont neither can you translate it in your own words please?
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
15POINTS
olganol [36]

Answer:  the answer is John Locke

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How much different would our country be today if the Constitution would not have been ratified?​
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

it would be very different, if the constitution wouldnt have been radified have of the rules that we have today wouldnt even be a thing.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lincoln let Confederate leaders know about his plan to resupply Fort Sumter so that
    6·2 answers
  • Identify the countries in Latin America where english is the official language
    15·1 answer
  • Much of the bill of rights has been made applicable to the states through the:
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following was built as a temple in ancient Mesopotamia?
    9·2 answers
  • What two principles form the basis for capitalism?
    15·2 answers
  • Choose the "languages" of the physical and biological science: multiple choose
    15·2 answers
  • A player touching the net on teh receiving team is called a
    7·1 answer
  • Help me pls I'll mark brainliest ​
    9·1 answer
  • Which statements about hydrothermal vents are true?
    8·2 answers
  • What do OSHA and the SEC have in common?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!