After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.
When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation
Answer:
"Human sacrifice supplied a diet of blood for Aztec Gods"
Explanation:
If you are talking about modern life now, it would not. This myth is brought to you by feminists. Voting women in to office changes nothing as men and women are equal. As a woman it bothers me a great deal that real people I will work with in the future have this opinion. This belief will change the conditions in which they work. I assume when you refer to "conditions" that you are saying that they are bad conditions. They are not, they are the same as men. Making this kind of distinction is very important as the myth is slowly being raised to think it is a fact to to be dealt with when in fact it is the opposite.
Answer:
A. Montezuma was fully convinced that Cortés was a god (specifically Quetzalcoatl)
Explanation:
Hope this helps, and please mark me brainliest if it does!
