Beer? at an electronic store? but srsly, 81*.07 is 5.67, total is 86.67
One of the errors made by Margie by saying the set of numbers 0, 1, -1, -21, 4, 3 is that the -21 should be the first number on the list.
The given set of numbers is:
0, 1, -1, -21, 4, 3.
Margie says that the set of numbers above is in order from least to greatest
Kindly note that:
The negative number with the highest magnitude is the lowest
The positive number with the highest magnitude is the highest
Arranging this number by carefully following the note above, the set of numbers above from the least to greatest is:
-21, -1, 0, 1, 3, 4
It is obvious that Margie made a mistake in arranging the numbers, and one of the mistake is that the -21 should be the first number on the list since it is the most negative
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/25874786
Since the data follows a normal distribution, the 68-95-97 rule can be used to describe the number of people falling under N standard deviations from the mean. Since the standard deviation is 1, hemoglobin levels of 13 -15 g/dL contains 68% of the sample, or 136 people. This means the 32 people have less than 13 g/dL and 32 people have more than 15 g/dL.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You need to specify what the goal of the problem is.
If Kai picked 7 times as many blueberries as Nico, then:
n + 7n + 297, or
8n = 297. Unfortunately, 8 does not divide evenly into 297, and we certainly are not interested in picking fractional blueberries.
If the problem mentioned 296 instead of 297 total blueberries, then
Nico (n) picked 47 blueberries and Kai picked 7 times that many, or 329.
Answer:
there are no statements...
