1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vitek1552 [10]
3 years ago
12

According to the article, what “new element which had not been evident in the Palestinian terrorism of two or three decades earl

ier” emerged in the 1970s? Islamic religious extremism Unhappiness with the Israeli occupation of the West Bank An alliance with al Qaeda Increased support of socialist and nationalist ideals
The answer is Islamic religious extremism- A
History
2 answers:
STatiana [176]3 years ago
6 0

According to the article,the new element which had been evident in the Palestinian terrorism was:

  • Islamic religious extremism.
NISA [10]3 years ago
3 0

The element that had not been evident in the Palestinian terrorism until the 1970s was its connections with Islamic religious extremism.  

Until then, it was believed that the actions carried out by the Palestinians had only political (anti-Israel) motives. But from that moment, it was found that not only were political reasons behind their attacks, but also religious ones (appearance of groups such as Al-Jihad, connections with Hamas in Lebanon).


You might be interested in
A negitve economic effect of world war 2 was
diamong [38]

Answer:

The effect of ww2 was..

World War II caused several severe hunger crises which led to many casualties, and may have had long-term effects on the health of survivors. For example, since the beginning of the German occupation in Poland, the nutritional situation of the non-German population was poor.

Hope it helped u if yes mark me BRAINLIEST!

Tysm!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL GIVE BRAINIEST!!!!! Why did Charles VI issue a rule that women could inherit Hapsburg lands?
zhannawk [14.2K]
Charles and his wife Elizabeth Christine had not had children, since 1711, Charles had been the sole surviving male member of the House of Habsburg. Charles's older brother, Joseph I, had died without male issue, leaving Joseph's daughter Maria Josepha as the heir presumptive. That presented two problems. First, a prior agreement with his brother, known as the Mutual Pact of Succession, had agreed that in the absence of male heirs, Joseph's daughters would take precedence over Charles's daughters in all Habsburg lands. Though Charles had no children, if he were to be survived by daughters alone, they would be cut out of the inheritance. Secondly, because Salic law precluded female inheritance, Charles VI needed to take extraordinary measures to avoid a protracted succession dispute, as other claimants would have surely contested a female inheritance. Charles VI was definitely succeeded by his own elder daughter, Maria Theresa (born 1717). However, despite the promulgation of the Pragmatic Sanction, her accession in 1740 resulted in the outbreak of the War of the Austrian Succession as Charles-Albert of Bavaria, backed by France, contested her inheritance. After the war, Maria Theresa's inheritance of the Habsburg lands was confirmed by the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, and the election of her husband, Francis I, as Holy Roman Emperor was secured by the Treaty of Füssen.
4 0
3 years ago
Which explanations did you included in your
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

stating that it is important that people control their own fate

5 0
3 years ago
Cite textual evidence to prove the conspiracy theory that Bigfoot is real please no links
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

Relatively few people, in or out of the field of science, believe in Bigfoot. A purported Bigfoot sighting would likely be met with the same level of credulity as a discovery of Casper, Elvis, Tupac, or Santa Claus. With only 16 percent of Americans Bigfoot believers, you might just write them off as crazy. But contrary to popular assumption, folklore experts say, Bigfoot believers may not be as irrational as you’d think.

“It’s easy to assume … that people who believe in Bigfoot are being irrational in their belief,” says Lynne McNeill, Cal grad, folklore professor, and special guest on the reality TV show Finding Bigfoot. “But that’s really not true. People aren’t jumping to supernatural conclusions very often; people are being quite rational. It doesn’t mean they’re correct; it just means they’re thinking rationally.”

OK. So what are some reasons why people might rationalize a belief in Bigfoot?

5 0
3 years ago
Allah knows____?<br> Prophet mohamed is ______?
inysia [295]

Answer:

1 prophet Mohammed

2 prophet Mohammed is the massanger

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Winfield Scott and Zachary Taylor have in common
    5·1 answer
  • Describe Constantine’s Contributions to the Spread of Christianity (minimum 50 words )
    9·2 answers
  • What kind of picture of Frontier life does Daniel Boone give, and does it seem representative of the frontier experience of the
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Panama canal benefit Panama's culture?
    14·1 answer
  • The presidents role as the head of the armed forces
    15·1 answer
  • Which one of the following was one of the most popular instruments in Medieval and Renaissance times and occasionally involved t
    13·1 answer
  • What was a result of the conquest of Constantinople?
    15·1 answer
  • The Hyksos came to Egypt from
    12·2 answers
  • This is an excerpt from a letter written by a soldier fighting in World War I and
    13·1 answer
  • Based on the map, which of the following is the best description of the land given in the Indian Territory? (1 point)
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!