Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
A person attempting to make a phone call while waiting for a meeting, is starting one task before another begins. So, it's not option B since multitasking is completing two or more tasks as once. It's not option C because sequential tasking, is beginning one task and not starting another in till that initial task is completed. It's not cleaving tasks or option D because cleaving tasks just means clinging to one task. Your best answer is option A or "combining tasks", since you are completing a phone call while waiting for your meeting. It means you are completing one task while waiting for another one to start.
Hope this helps.
The correct answer is conscious experience
This conscious experience, according to Titchener, is dependent on the individual who experiences it, differing from that studied by scientists from other areas. For example, both Physics and Psychology are able to study light or sound, however, each professional will have different guidance, methods and objectives.
Physicists examine the phenomena from the point of view of the physical processes involved, while psychologists analyze the same phenomena based on the experience and personal observation of those who experience them. The other sciences do not depend on the personal experience of the subject who observes a phenomenon, nor on his description of the feelings involved. They just observe and report the results.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
Answer: Party loyalists are likely to vote for all of their party's candidates in any election.
Answer:
Nurture
Nature
Explanation:
The lecture based on nurture will involve a discussion about whether external factors such as the environment, culture, social, etc have affect your grooming and behaviour or not. It does not involve anything biological.
The second lecture will be based on nature where the role of genetics and other biological factors will be discussed. It will shed light on the extent to which biological factors shape human behaviour and personality.
