The correct answer would be, Assets.
When an entrepreneur takes some of his profits and replaces old machinery, he is investing in Assets.
Explanation:
An entrepreneur is a person who initiates a business and runs it to earn profits. He is fully aware of the risk associated with the business in the form of loss, but he puts his efforts to run the business in the hope of earning profits.
Assets are things which add value to the business. Assets are basically a company's long term, fixed, liquid or current possessions. Assets may include the following:
- Cash
- Treasury Bills
- Lands
- Property
- Machinery
- Furniture
- Savings
- Inventory, etc
So When an entrepreneur takes some of his profits and replaces old machinery with the new one, he is actually adding value to the business, which means he is investing in the assets.
Learn more about Assets at:
brainly.com/question/3886775
#LearnWithBrainly
Territorial expansion would be closely related to immigration. Thanks to the European demographic contributions, the conquest of the West could be undertaken. But this expansion had a serious demographic consequence, since it supposed the decline of the indigenous populations, shut in reserves, after a hard and cruel confrontation. On the other hand, the black population grew during the 19th century, although not in relative terms, since in the total population the percentage of this population decreased due to its lower standard of living, which caused a higher mortality rate.
On the other hand, the large settlers were the maximum beneficiaries, since they obtained the benefits of the land.
It was the Denver broncos against the Carolina panthers and the broncos won.
Because the slaves are what worked the economy, while everyone else did nothing. Without the slaves the entire thing would collapse because slave owners would not want to work.
<span />
Answer: hope it helps :)))))))
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. Whether and, if so, how slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years. The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as people for this purpose. Its effect was to give the Southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally
