yes? I'm not to sure about it.
To answer this question lets take a look at the options:
<u>Many more people served in the military than worked on the home front.</u> - False - Based in the reduction of unemployment resulted from the millions of war jobs created, we can affirm there were more people working in the home front than in the military. The shortage of job was so intense that millions of retired people, housewives, and students entered the labor force.
<u>Women worked on the home front but did not serve in the US military.</u> - False - Approximately two hundred thousand women served in the Women’s Army Corps (WAC) and the navy’s equivalent, Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service (WAVES). Others joined the Marine Corps, the Coast Guard, and the Army Air Force.
<u>The efforts of soldiers and factory workers were both vital to the Allied war effort.</u> - True - The industries and induction centers of the country were mobilized to supply the Army. The military effort was strongly supported by civilians, who provided military personnel, shelter and money, as an incentive to fight in the war.
<u>The United States mobilized millions of soldiers and workers for the war effort</u>. - True - During the war, more than 16 million Americans served in the United States Armed Forces, with more than 405,000 dead in combat and more than 671,000 injured.
Answer:
It is quite controversial but I think he was in the right.
Explanation:
Let's say he didn't drop the atomic bomb. Instead of 225,000 Japanese dying, it would be 100,000 Americans and 200,000 Japanese because of the battles on the Japanese mainland. This is an estimate of course, it could be less, but the fighting would be drawn out and the troops would die of diseases and he wanted to end the war as soon as possible.
"There is no instance of a nation benefitting from prolonged warfare." - Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Answer:
I think its D relationship between plants and animals
Explanation:
sorry if im wrong
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.
The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.
