Explain why 6:4 and 18:8 are not equevalent ratios

1 answer:

7 0

False they are equivalent ratios.

You might be interested in

mr_godi [17]

Answer:

the reciprocal is 2/1

you just flip the denominator and numerator to get your reciprocal

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

kotegsom [21]

The correct answer would be B

7 0

3 years ago

Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Pie

To subtract vectors, you simply have to subtract correspondent coordinates.

So, if you have

$u = \langle u_1,\ u_2,\ldots u_n\rangle ,\quad v = \langle v_1,\ v_2,\ldots v_n\rangle$

the subtraction is simply

$u-v = \langle u_1-v_1,\ u_2-v_2,\ldots u_n-v_n\rangle$

So, in your case, we have

$\langle-9,4\rangle-\langle 8,-5\rangle=\langle -9-8, 4+5\rangle=\langle -17,9\rangle$

3 0

3 years ago

Vlad [161]

The answer is (6•n) - (6•3)= 6n-9

8 0

3 years ago