Explain why 6:4 and 18:8 are not equevalent ratios
1 answer:
You might be interested in
We have that
using a graph tool
see the attached figure
case A) x − 2y > 3
this <span>inequality represented the graph
case B) </span><span>x − 2y < 3
</span>this inequality not represented the graph
case C) <span>2x − y > 3
</span>this inequality not represented the graph
case D) <span>2x − y < 3
</span>this inequality not represented the graph
the answer is
the option <span>A, x − 2y > 3</span>
using a graph tool
see the attached figure
case A) x − 2y > 3
this <span>inequality represented the graph
case B) </span><span>x − 2y < 3
</span>this inequality not represented the graph
case C) <span>2x − y > 3
</span>this inequality not represented the graph
case D) <span>2x − y < 3
</span>this inequality not represented the graph
the answer is
the option <span>A, x − 2y > 3</span>
Answer:
The graph in the attached figure
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
x -----> the number of solved puzzles
y -----> the number of solved riddles
we know that
The solution of the inequality is the shaded area above the solid line
The slope of the solid line is negative
The y-intercept of the solid line is the point (0,4)
The x-intercept of the solid line is the point (2,0)
therefore
The graph in the attached figure
