Answer:
I don't know how to answer to this at all but We Must bring more awareness to this.
You will learn as you get older that the human world is RUN by economics.
<span>Realistically, economics is a reflection of the real driving force in ALL life; ecology. </span>
<span>All of the functions in life, including psychology, are determined by the ecology of the surrounding environment. </span>
<span>You've no doubt heard of the argument Nature vs. Nurture, and may have stumbled upon the accepted fact that it is, indeed, both. </span>
<span>Not quite, but very close. It SEEMS like it's both because Nature is DETERMINED by nurture. </span>
<span>If we occurred on Saturn, our thinking process would be quite different, as would we. We probably wouldn't resemble what we are now.
</span>
Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy, which gave a single person total power over the government and exempted the king from all checks and balances. On the other side, Locke endorsed a more liberal strategy for creating states.
What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?
Both Locke and Hobbes saw the social compact as being crucial to the political stability of a state. But each of these ideas was based on a very different understanding of human nature.
Why was Locke's viewpoint so much different than Hobbes?
The natural rules revealed by Locke exist in the state of nature, in opposition to Hobbes. Additionally, they are regarded as fundamental aspects of human nature since they violate people's right to personal freedom. A state of conflict is not the same as a state of nature.
Learn more about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories: brainly.com/question/1596903
#SPJ4
