Answer:
emmm we cant graph
Step-by-step explanation:
there isnt one. just go from the y intercept and go 2 up and 5 left.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to simplify the original function using partial fraction, hence:
![From\ Laplace\ inverse:\\\\But\ L^{-1}[\frac{1}{s-a} ]=e^{at}\\\\Hence:\\\\L^{-1} [\frac{5s}{s^2+3s-4}]=L^{-1}[\frac{1}{s-1} ]+L^{-1}[\frac{4}{s+4} ]=e^{t}+4e^{-4t}\\\\L^{-1} [\frac{5s}{s^2+3s-4}]=e^{t}+4e^{-4t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=From%5C%20Laplace%5C%20inverse%3A%5C%5C%5C%5CBut%5C%20L%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bs-a%7D%20%5D%3De%5E%7Bat%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CHence%3A%5C%5C%5C%5CL%5E%7B-1%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B5s%7D%7Bs%5E2%2B3s-4%7D%5D%3DL%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bs-1%7D%20%5D%2BL%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7Bs%2B4%7D%20%5D%3De%5E%7Bt%7D%2B4e%5E%7B-4t%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CL%5E%7B-1%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B5s%7D%7Bs%5E2%2B3s-4%7D%5D%3De%5E%7Bt%7D%2B4e%5E%7B-4t%7D)
Answer:
A. $307,172.72
Step-by-step explanation:
Inez has to pay 4 percent in closing costs and 16 percent for the down payment on a purchase of $225,500 with an ARM.
4% + 16% = 20%
lnez has to pay 20% of $225,500
= 225,500*20/100
= 225,500*0.2
= $45100
lnez has to pay $45100.
Over the life of the loan, lnez will pay $262,072.72
Now we have to add down payment, closing cost and the payment over the life of the loan.
$45100 + $262,072.72
= $307,172.72
Answer: A. $307,172.72
Thank you.
company A :
30,000 + 0.03(37499) = 31124.97...sales less then 37500
30,000 + 0.03(37501) = 31125.03....sales exceed 37500
30,000 + 0.03(249000) = 37470 ...sales less then 250000
30,000 + 0.03(251000) = 37530....sales exceed 250000
company B :
25,000 + 0.05(37499) = 26874.95...sales less then 37500
25,000 + 0.05(37501) = 26875.05...sales exceed 37500
25000 + 0.05(249000) = 37450...sales less then 250000
25,000 + 0.05(251000) = 37550...sales exceed 250000
so i believe your answer is option b,
company A pays better when sales are less then 250,000, but company B pays better when sales exceed 250,000 <==
