That is false
The court would never do that , but before you would eat , you need to check if this belong to you or not
Answer:
Instructions are listed below
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The high-low method involves taking the highest level of activity and the lowest level of activity and comparing the total costs at each level.
Mountain has recorded the following for the past nine months:
January:
Number of Cavities= 375
Total cost= $5,300
February:
Number of Cavities 500
TC= 5,850
March
Number of Cavities 350
TC= 5,200
April
Number of Cavities 600
TC=6,250
May
Number of Cavities 325
TC= 5,150
June
Number of Cavities 475
TC= 5,700
July
Number of Cavities 525
TC= 6,100
August
Number of Cavities 575
TC= 6,300
September
Number of Cavities 450
TC= 5,550
A) Variable cost= (Highest activity cost - lowest activity cost) / (Highest activity units - lowest activity units)
Variable cost= (6300 - 5150) / (600 - 325)= 4.18 per unit
Fixed cost= HACost - (variable cost per unit * HAUnits)= 6300 - (4.18*600)= 3792
Fixed cost= LACost - (variable cost per unit* LAUnits)= 5150 - (4.18*325)= 3792
B) Q= 400
Total cost= 3792 + 4.18*400= $5464
Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
In supply chain management, incremental analysis is in charge of determining the cost of ordering one more additional unit of a product over the cost of no requesting that additional unit. The cost of overstimulating demand is the loss of ordering one additional unit and discovering that it cannot be sold. The cost of underestimating demand is the opportunity loss for nor requesting one additional and discovering it could have been sold.
<em>The cost of underestimating demand is more difficult to determine than the cost of overestimating demand because underestimating demand because it involves customer's desires</em> on purchasing a product when not having the resources to do so.
We can actually deduce here that the unintended consequences of an economic change that are not immediately identifiable but are felt only with time are known in economics as: D. Secondary effects.
<h3>What is unintended consequence?</h3>
Unintended consequence, as seen in social sciences are known to be the result or outcome that is gotten from a purposeful action which were not seen coming.
The options that complete the question are:
a. scarcity constraints.
b. marginal effects.
c. opportunity costs.
d. secondary effects
We can actually deduce here that such unintended consequences of an economic change that are not immediately identifiable but are felt only with time are known in economics are known to be secondary effects.
Learn more about unintended consequence on brainly.com/question/17228614
#SPJ1
Answer:
$200 (million)
Explanation:
If the government spending increases by $200 million, then associated change in equilibrium income will be $ 200 million, assuming that Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 1
