Answer:
We can assume companies form country A export to country B. Country B's economy is very large and many domestic and foreign firms compete in it. High levels of competition will eventually lower the costs of products sold in a market, so the products sold in Country B have relatively low prices. 
In order for foreign companies to compete in country B's market they must have low prices. So companies from country A will sell its products in country B at low prices, increasing the possibility that the price of their exports are lower than their domestic prices (prices for their own country). Therefore the chance for a dumping accusation increases. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
The appropriate labels for Curves N and M in the nearby graph is that the Curve N is total cost and Curve M is total variable cost.
<h3>Why is the curve as stated about?</h3>
Because a fixed cost is constant, this is not shown on the graph, however, the movement of the variable cost impacts directly on the total cost as well but it will be higher.
Hence, the appropriate labels for Curves N and M in the nearby graph is that the Curve N is total cost and Curve M is total variable cost.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about total cost 
<em>brainly.com/question/5168855</em>
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
En economía, se habla de teorías del valor para indicar el conjunto de concepciones sobre la génesis y determinación del valor, como propiedad de las mercancías distinta del costo y lógicamente antecedente al precio, que constituye su manifestación fenomenal en esta perspectiva.
La economía política siempre ha tratado de responder a la pregunta: ¿de dónde viene el valor? Las respuestas fueron muy divergentes. Van desde la escasez de bienes disponibles, a su utilidad, a la necesidad de remunerar los factores productivos, incluido el capital y considerando su remuneración; - el beneficio - como recompensa por la abstinencia del capitalista, que puede permitirse renunciar al consumo para utilizar la propia riqueza de forma productiva, etc.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The closest answer is 49.
Explanation:
Given that,
Annual demand, D = 43,000 units
Ordering cost, O = $200 
Per unit cost of the item = $50
Annual holding cost, H =  annual holding rate × Per unit cost of the item
                                       = 35% × $50
                                       = $17.5


               = 991.39
               = 992 units
Therefore,
Number of orders per year = Annual demand ÷ EOQ
                                              = 43,000 ÷ 992
                                              = 43.34 
Hence, the closest answer is 49 and this is not given in the question.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Based on the fact that Wreckorp wants to maintain an exclusivity image and limits its distribution to 100 stores in each region, it is Impossible to determine legality based on the information provided.
<h3>Are Wreckorp's actions legal?</h3>
It is not possible to know if Wreckorp's actions are legal or illegal because the information provided does not give the full facts. 
The actions of Wreckorp may be legal if no region is being disadvantaged but it could be illegal if this is the case. More information is therefore needed. 
Options for this question are:
- Strictly illegal 
- Impossible to determine legality based on the information provided 
- Strictly Legal 
Find out more on the legality of business actions at brainly.com/question/4556120.
#SPJ1