awnser
A.“The President . . . may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments . . .”
explaintion The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each separation of powers and how the Constitution set up a system of checks and balences
Answer:
criticism of the government
Explanation:
i think so because the first amendment talks about freedom of speech and Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely.
Adolf Hitler was already dead by the end of WW II. He suicided after the fall of Berlin to the USSR late-1945
Hope this helps
REGRESSIVE ... lower income
So the full sentence would read: <span>With a regressive, the tax rate decreases as income increases. Lower income individuals bear a greater burden with this type of tax.
An example of a regressive tax would be a sales tax on everyday items. Lower income individuals must spent a higher percentage of their income on basic necessities, so sales taxes on necessary items takes from them a higher percentage of their income than is the case for wealthy individuals. If there are higher rates of tax on luxury items (like yachts or luxury cars) that are purchased only by higher-income people, that would not be regressive. But otherwise sales taxes affect a greater percentage of the poor's income than the rich.
Another example (and another consumption tax) would be taxes on gasoline. Think of two commuters who both drive 30 miles a day to get to work, in cars that get similar gas mileage. If one of those persons makes $100,000 a year, and the other person has a job that earns only $25,000 a year, the person earning $25,000 a year is paying the same amount in gas taxes as the person making $100,000 a year. That's a regressive tax.
[A detail to note: Americans on average across the country pay about 50 cents in taxes that is included in the price of each gallon of gas purchased.]</span>
Answer:
Parliament / The People
Explanation:
The English Bill of Rights 1689 had forbidden the imposition of taxes without the consent of Parliament; however, the colonists had no representation in Parliament. As such, the taxes violated the guaranteed rights of the colonists. ( No representation = Unlawful taxation. )
