Answer:
Yes, it is. including China, Hong Kong, Japan, Macau, Mongolia, North Korea, and Taiwan. Have a great day and I hope this helps!
Answer:
gathering information
Explanation:
The decision making process is critical for considering all relevant elements and avoiding errors when a decision needs to be made. From this process, complexity and uncertainty gradually give way to a deeper understanding of the problem and the cost-effectiveness of the available options. Regarding the case presented in the question above, we can say that Professor Thompson, in the phase called gathering information, in the decision making process.
The phase called gathering information is about understanding the situation, gathering as much information about the problem as possible. This phase is directed to the causes of a problem or to the justifications of a position in the problem. One tip to use this phase is to use mind maps to associate the description of the problem and the data obtained about it.
Answer:
Ingratiation strategy
Explanation:
Ingratiation strategy is the correct answer because this is a psychological technique in which a person influences the other person and he influences the other person by showing himself or herself the most likeable person. The same thing Myra is doing, she reflecting herself as polite and friendly which means she is influencing others by becoming a likeable person.
<u>Answer:
</u>
In a negligence lawsuit, at least three of the four elements of negligence must be proven for a plaintiff to recover damages is a FALSE statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In order to prove a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff must be able to prove all the four elements of the lawsuit which include duty, breach, cause, and harm.
- If in case the defendant manages to insulate himself from any one out of these four, the lawsuit can be subjected to dismissal.
The answer is "the social-conflict approach".
The social conflict approach is a way to deal with social theory that contends that society is described by different disparities and clashes that reason individuals to act socially, delivering change.
Society, according to the social conflict approach, isn't amicable. It's not steady. Society doesn't create agreeable balance. Truth be told, it's overflowing with imbalance. So this methodology is extremely about investigating imbalances of race, class, sexual orientation, and ethnicity, and the social clashes which result. Basically, these contentions will result in change, changes that will move society.
