USA had a better navy. (The White Fleet?)
USA was backed by guerrlia warfare in the Philippines.
USA had terrible guns going against the Spanish in the San Juan hill.
The USA Springfield Gun 1892 - 99 side clip was highly inefficient compared to the Spanish Mauser.
The Spanish had more firepower the Maxim beat the Gattling Gun.
Answer:
Nazis were outright extremists. What set them apart from the other extremist parties at the time was hitler's language and volume of his speech.
Explanation:
Hitler was known as a hotheaded politician since he was quick to anger and swore a lot during his speeches. The Nazi parties' popularity grew and grew to the point where you could only choose from the communists and the nazis. Since the communists were already feared (because of the red scare) many turned to the nazis
Answer:
Polk wanted California and its magnificent San Francisco Bay as the American gateway to trade with China and other Asian nations. Polk was worried that other nations, such as England or France, might take California if the United States did not act.
Explanation:
It allowed them fewer ships than the US and Britain limiting the kind of parity they hoped to have on the world stage in terms of naval power.
One of the arguments went that the US and Britain had to have larger navies because of their need to maintain a force in more than one operating theater while the Japanese only had to worry about their side of the Pacific. It wasn't something that made a number of hardcore military types within the Japanese leadership very happy, but they ended up signing the treaty anyway (though refused to renew it in the 1930s).
