1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
san4es73 [151]
3 years ago
11

How are the schools in poland different from the united states

History
1 answer:
maksim [4K]3 years ago
6 0

Depending upon the territory, K-12 educational systems greatly vary. Although most of these structures have only been patterned to the USA's original method, different countries' own takes on the K-12 educational organization has differed in so many ways. For instance, comparing America's K-12 schools with Europe's, specifically Poland's, would show a lot of dissimilarities.

One distinction between the two is the age of actual schooling. Before the K-12 system starts, both Polish and American kids are required to take a one-year pre-primary education or what most would call a kindergarten. American students would come as early as age 5 to 6. Polish kids however, start schooling at the 7 year old mark. Poland has recently gone into educational reformation wherein the before 8 year grade school education was cut down into 6 to go along with most neighboring countries. The USA follows a 6 year primary schooling as well. So at age 11 or 12, Americans are alongside 13 year olds in Polish when it comes to education received technically. Polish kids can also start "studying" by age 3 but it's mostly a playing environment and is only optional.

A further variation between the two is the type of schools offered. After middle school of 3 years in both countries, most American schools only offer academic education - or an education which shall prepare students for a higher education such as college. Polish high schools however can be a choice between a general lyceum, a vocational education and a technical secondary school. It depends on the compulsory exam to be taken at the end of a year where a Polish kid could qualify and continue his or her high school education. The amount of years a student would spend in these is 3, 3 and 4 years respectively. From vocational studies alone, a Polish student could already earn what is called a vocational diploma, stop schooling and work already.

After the Polish Reformation, the grading system of schools in Poland was also revised. The grades range from 1, 2-, 2, 2+ and so on until the full marks of 6 is received. 1 is considered as a failing grade. 2 is fair and 3 to 5 are passing rates. 6 is often given to the top students in the class and is usually noted as "exceeds expectations". If a 1 is given to a student, he or she is then obligated to repeat not only the subject but the whole year as well so 1 is an uncommon mark in Polish schools. How are K-12 schools different in Poland compared to the U.S.? American states on the other hand, commonly use the A+ to F grading system. A+ is the highest marks while an F is failing.

Another difference between Polish and American schools is the bilingual education program. Americans are mostly taught their own language and to learn an additional language is often just a choice of the student. Although some schools require a foreign language program, the language will only be taught on one year. In Poland, most schools have a compulsory additional language program, especially for minority institutions. In most Polish schools, it is a choice between English, German, Spanish, Latin, French and many more.

Another big difference is the examinations for higher education. In America, teens can take a test in any school they want. If they pass, then they are entitled to go to that school to finish a college degree. In Poland however, like the high school examinations, they are then taken to answer a finishing test which will decide in which school they are eligible to study. The weight of these tests could actually decide a Polish's future.

-sorry if im no help...

You might be interested in
Briefly explain to major platform issues of the Republican Party
tiny-mole [99]

Immigration, American Policy, and Foreign Policy.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help pls im timed ://
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

Option B: The U.S was destined to expand westward and spread civilization.

Explanation:

Using the system of trial-and-error, you know that options C and D aren't the correct answers to the question, as the quote says nothing about land, nor about Native American tribes.

For the remaining two choices, Turner said nothing about the Americans becoming weaker with Western life – nor did he even mention any hardships! And so, with the three choices cancelled out, option B seems to be the best answer to this question.

5 0
3 years ago
Which new England colony was established by the separatists?
alukav5142 [94]
It was the Puritans the ones who established it
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Violence toward native americans
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

...What about it-

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the complex cause and effect
iragen [17]

Answer: The answer is complex and not straightforward.

Explanation:

The article relates to Churchill and Roosevelt, so is probably dated from World War 2.

Given this and the reference to the use of force by aggressive nations it is reasonable to assume that this refers to the Axis nations and their allies, primarily Germany, Japan and Italy.

What is being referred to is reflected in the policies applied to Germany and Japan at the end of World War 2. (Italy had already switched sides and deposed Mussolini).

In the post war agreements drawn up, Germany and Japan were largely demilitarised with strict control over their armed forces. In the case of West Germany their limited armed forces existed only within the context of NATO to prevent any aggressive use as was evidenced at the beginning of World War 2.

In both instances these countries were not allowed to develop or possess nuclear weapons.

Until such time as there is a global disarmament treaty, as referred to in the article, then countries which are deemed "aggressive", the losers in a conflict, by others, the winners, have arms controls imposed.

Of course this does not and has not stopped the proliferation of weapons, and conflicts throughout the world since 1945, including the aggressive policies of countries such as the UK and the USA.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did European influence change Asian trade relations?
    13·1 answer
  • How are nations similar to individuals in regard to economics ? A.nations do not have to pay for public goods and services
    5·1 answer
  • Developed during the ad 500s, _____________ became one of the major byzantine industries. *
    10·1 answer
  • What did the native american groups do to fight more effectively in the northwest(early us)
    13·1 answer
  • Were the intolerable act a good move by Britain
    8·1 answer
  • How does preserving land for national parks and forests benefit people?
    6·1 answer
  • Activity
    12·1 answer
  • What is the difference between a Greek tragedy and comedy?
    12·1 answer
  • As a result of the Cuban Missile Crisis, was communism contained or expanded? Explain.
    11·1 answer
  • How did west Africans see the Europeans
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!