All decisions involve trade-offs. Trade offs are the alternatives one gives up whenever one chooses one course of action leaving out out all other alternative courses of action.
Trade-offs are practically found in all economic decisions. For instance, when one chooses to take a special cup of cappuccino for $330, this excludes spending this amount of cash on tea or fruit juice. When you choose to buy an expensive piece of art, you will have to spend more money towards maintenance and security of the painting. If you decide to work in a far-off city due to better pay there, you spend less time with family and friends in your hometown.
Stefan is probably worried about the performance risk of his lawnmower.
<h3 /><h3>What is performance risk?</h3>
Corresponds to the risk related to a purchase, that is, a consumer who pays for a product expecting to obtain a benefit, but that this benefit is not fulfilled due to a defect in the manufacture or in some expected specification.
Therefore, performance risk legally guarantees that the buyer will not be harmed by any non-conformity in the purchased product.
Find out more about performance risk here:
brainly.com/question/13905761
#SPJ1
Answer: A. Expressing rage over the terrible plight of drug addicts to demonstrate her intense commitment to change
Explanation: What will certainly not increase credibility with the audience is expressing rage. While it may seem that expressing rage and anger is good for showing commitment to a problem, a desire for change, and that Amy cares about reducing the suffering of drug addicts, rage shows that there is a lack of composure with Amy, and composure is key when one wants to gain credibility, because anger can point to certain shortcomings of anyone who wants credibility at all costs.
On the other hand, showing keen interests and enthusiasm for problem solving indicates dynamism, while quoting adequate sources to confirm claims and fluent speaking are elements of competence, that is, someone who has the competence to solve a problem.
Believing that others are right is
to private acceptance and as conforming without believing is to public
compliance. Public compliance involves a change in behavior including the
public expression of opinions that is not accompanied by an actual change in
one’s private opinion. Thus, compliance represents what people do or say in
public, even though they believe something different in private. A driver might
follow the speed limit or wear a tie which is a behavior to conform to social
norms even though we may not necessarily believe that it is appropriate to do
so which is opinion. However, behaviors that are formerly executed out of a
desire to be accepted which is normative conformity may frequently produce
changes in beliefs to match them and the result becomes private acceptance
which is for instance a child who begins smoking to please his friends but soon
convinces himself that it is the right thing to do or a prisoner of war who
eventually accepts the political beliefs of his captor.