<u>In general, how do empires fall apart?</u>
<em>Most</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>common</em><em> </em><em>reasons</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>probably</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>reduction</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>wealth</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>power</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Not</em><em> </em><em>enough</em><em> </em><em>money</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>afford</em><em> </em><em>an</em><em> </em><em>army</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>mass</em><em> </em><em>poverty</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>wrong</em><em> </em><em>decisions</em><em> </em><em>made</em><em> </em><em>regarding</em><em> </em><em>policies</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>government</em>
<u>In what ways were the Han and Roman Empire</u><u>s alike? </u>
<em>They</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>alike</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>their</em><em> </em><em>similar</em><em> </em><em>military</em><em> </em><em>techniques</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>methods</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>They both had a centralized, bureaucratic government</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>oth Rome and Han established their territories through defending and fighting for their land.</em><em> </em><em>Also</em><em> </em><em>its</em><em> </em><em>worth</em><em> </em><em>mentioning</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>their</em><em> </em><em>r</em><em>0</em><em>ads and defensive walls</em><em> </em><em>were</em><em> </em><em>quite</em><em> </em><em>similar</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>well</em><em>.</em>
<u>In what ways were the Han and Roman </u><u>Empires</u><u> </u><u>different</u><u>?</u>
<em>T</em><em>he Han Dynasty was based on Confucian philosophy</em><em> </em><em>while the Romans worshipped many gods and believed in strict military discipline. The Romans were more aggressive than the Chinese, who were often just as content to rely on diplomacy and foreign trade</em>
Hope this helped you, have a good day bro cya)
According to Hawaii is a small territory that was annexed to the USA in 1898. Although that the annexation was carried out by mainly to increase American control, this is best annexation brought many controversies by Americans who did not see the annexation with a good eye and also that mainly, by the Hawaiians who did not consider that it was beneficial to them.
Firstly that when many Americans complained that Hawaii was an extremely small territory, its annexation would bring that are a great expense to the American economy and also the little benefit that is Hawaii was a very small territory and also that it had little influence both politically and economically.
When The Hawaiians did not want to give up their dominance in their territory that is claimed its Hawaii was sufficient economically and also that politically to survive without the help of a foreign government that it would decimate their are the culture and also that interfere in their governance, <u>ethnicity, customs, and supremacy.</u>
Http://www.feldmeth.net/US/fandiwar.html
Website has good info.
Each Indian and French war had a purpose. Many were killed during the time they had colonized America. Many deaths but at the same time positive outcomes (Crops, Animals, Money, Trade route, etc.)
Lands Further Away from England
The gold rush helped in growth and development by <span>
-Leading to a large increase in the population of the territory </span>
<span>-Promoted the establishment of new shipping routes and railroad lines
</span><span>-Encouraged the creation of laws and government institutions that helped prepare the territory for statehood </span>