The final option. Unbiased would be a fault, it's opinionated. It isn't meant to convince anyone and it isn't an election based on religion.
Job Opportunities, free public education wasn’t really a motivating factor, neither was nativism
This is how I would go: (I'm just glossing over it, sorry if you think it lacks detail. :L)
<span>1. California does not deserve a seat in the United Nations. </span>
<span>2. The UN is only for nations; people in California are US citizens; they do not have a culture nor a culture that is exclusive to the rest of the US. In this sense, California is not a nation. (this is the definition of a nation bit.) </span>
<span>3. Federalism, the system where states and national governments share power. California (states in general) does not have the power to enter into treaties with foreign countries, nor regulate commerce with foreign countries. These powers are exclusive to the national government. This would mean that it cannot be given a seat, where these powers would be put into California's hands. I guess states governments would also fit into here somewhere. </span>
Answer:
Three-fifths 
Explanation:
This question is mathematics not history; however, the solution is as follows.
Given
Line Segments A'B' and AB
Center of Dilation = P


Required
Scale factor of dilation;
The scale factor of dilation is defined as thus;
Scale Factor is the ration of the distance between the center points and origin of the dilated line segment to the original line segment;
In other words;

Substitute
and 

Hence, the scale factor of this dilation is Three-fifths or 