1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tigry1 [53]
3 years ago
10

Marty stabs Chris’s hand while playing poker because he is mad he is losing. Ordinarily, a person could just wrap a wound like t

his and be fine. However, Chris has hemophilia, but he hasn’t told anyone even though he’s had it for years, which means he bleeds more than most people and can die from even minor injuries. He bleeds to death.
CAN MARTY BE CHARGED FOR THE DEATH OF CHRIS?
Law
2 answers:
ANEK [815]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It is mostly the responsibility of Marty. Marty should’ve been more careful when playing poker with Chris. Either way there is concequences for everything bad you do so yes Marty is going to be charged for the death of Chris.

Explanation:

ycow [4]3 years ago
5 0
Yes marty can absolutely be charged.
You might be interested in
George’s PTIN has been revoked as a disciplinary measure. Which of these can’t he do?
Alla [95]

Answer:

Option A (Prepare taxes for compensation) is the correct choice.

Explanation:

In the above question, options are not given. Please find the attachment of the full question.

  • A PTIN (preparer tax identification number) would be an inland revenue department Service identifier that was introduced in 1999 requiring all compensated federal income tax returns appraisers to registered with either the legislative branch as well as to receive a special code from 2010.
  • Here because the tax identifying number or code of George's Preparer has indeed been withdrawn and so he can't take responsibility for taxation for reimbursement.

The remaining three options do not apply to a particular instance. So option A seems to be the right one.

4 0
4 years ago
In a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the j
ziro4ka [17]

Considering the legal practice and standards, it is <u>false</u> that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.

<h3>What is Jurisdiction in online transactions?</h3>

Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.

In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.

Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."

Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: brainly.com/question/10377896

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Daphne contracts with speedy builders inc. To construct a six-foot fence around her yard. Daphne’s neighbor rando is delighted b
Sladkaya [172]

According to law Daphne has the power to sue Speedy Builders for breach of contract.

A legal claim and category of civil wrong known as "breach of contract" refers to when a number of the parties to a contract refuse to perform their obligations under the terms of the agreement or interfere with the performance of the other party. A party commits a breach when it disobeys one or more of its obligations under a contract, whether completely or partially. It may also convey its intent to breach the agreement or otherwise show that it is unable to fulfill its obligations. When a contract is broken, the parties who broke the agreement is responsible for paying the injured party's damages

Learn more about breach of contract here:

brainly.com/question/28101555

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Congress can print money but cannot issue licenses. States can issue licenses but cannot print money. What constitutional princi
zavuch27 [327]
Congress passes a law
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The fact that there is a free exercise clause in the First amendment of the constitution illustrates that
Pani-rosa [81]

The fact that there is a free exercise clause in the First amendment of the constitution illustrates that people can practice religion freely.

<h3>What is Amendment?</h3>

It should be noted that Amendment simply means the changes made to the Constitution.

In this case, the fact that there is a free exercise clause in the First amendment of the constitution illustrates that people can practice religion freely without interference by government.

Learn more about Amendment on:

brainly.com/question/510331

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What college is the best college for law?
    5·2 answers
  • Your line of sight is:
    12·1 answer
  • True or False? Shooting a burglar inside your home, while defending your family, is a justifiable defense.
    10·2 answers
  • QUIZ
    11·1 answer
  • A defendant was involved in an accident in which her car struck the rear end of the car driven by the plaintiff. The police issu
    10·1 answer
  • According to the Declaration of Independence, what was an "unalienable right" (God-given rights/born with) that all governments
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP! 70 POINTS!
    6·1 answer
  • What was franklin roosevelt's key contributions?
    9·1 answer
  • The length of a rectangle is 5 feet less twice the width. The perimeter is 50 feet
    10·1 answer
  • If Josh throws the baseball 85 meters in 5 seconds, what is the average speed of<br> the baseball?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!