Answer:
well, the correct first act would be to file a noise complaint, but for the answers given, I would choose D.
Explanation:
A. to sue bates for money damages would be not smart as there is no evidence that he did any damages. he's just using a noisy lawn mower.
B. Bates did not commit a crime as far as we know. unless they have filed multiple complaints, this is just a simple agitating thinghe's doing.
C. to present a signed petition seems a little far-fetched. I belive this would be the correct thing to do if this continues. but the amount of time it would take to get all of the votes it wouldn't even be worth it at the end.
with all of those rolled out, the best answer Is D.
please make me brainliest.
Answer:
The correct answer is D search telephone records.
Explanation:
The US PATRIOT Act stands for the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. Its purpose is to help catching terrorists in the US.
It has nothing to do with troops movement or airport security. So the correct answer is D search telephone records.
Answer:
Rick roll the person back
Explanation:
It's the only reasonable response. But do it when their least expecting it
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. Most of the executives were secretly blue-collar workers.
B. Companies were careful never to violate American law.
C. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was unintentional.
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Answer:
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Explanation:
Edwin Sutherland was surprised to discover scenes of corruption and violation of laws within American industries. He was even more surprised when he discovered that these violations were done intensionally, promoting the benefit of entrepreneurs who had no commitment to order and honesty. These crimes are known as White Collar and are made by people who already live a wealthy life and without economic difficulties.
Answer:
B. The court is authorized to hear the case and make a ruling after considering the arguments.
Explanation:
The jurisdiction in legal terms refers to the geographical coverage or reach of a case to be tried, heard, and decide on the matter. This means that cases of any legal matter are tried according to their jurisdictional situations.
In cases of a court that has jurisdiction over a legal dispute, the court is at the liberty to hear and decide on the matter. The court can hear the case and make a ruling after all arguments are presented. The jurisdiction allows the court to act on the case as it likes. This means that the court has the right to make any ruling regarding the case as it has jurisdiction over it.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.