For what reasons could Thailand be described as a developing country in the 1970s? In what ways was it able to change?

History

1 answer:

Sonja [21]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

In the 1970s, Thailand had a very low GDP Per Capita. In 1970, Thailand's GDP Per Capita was only 192 dollars. For comparison, the U.S. GDP Per Capita in the same year was 5.247 dollars.

Besides, in the 1970s, Thailand was a monarchy where the king at the time: king Bhumibol Adulyadej, had effective powers over the people. Not all monarchies are developing countries, but monarchies and dictatorships tend to be poorer because of the lack of independent judiciary and enforcement of property rights which disincentivizes investment and economic growth.

You might be interested in

What 3 types of<br> methods did<br> the Kings of Labor use

galben [10]

Answer:

The workers can not only bargain their salary but also working conditions, job security and benefits through the union. To get their demands, the unions rely on various strategies during the course of bargaining, including striking, parading, boycott and collective bargaining.

Explanation:

The internet lol

5 0

2 years ago

what man made structure was built in central america in 1914 to create a water way from the pacific to the Atlantic ocean

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

<span>The Panama Canal is an artificial 77 km waterway in Panama that connects the Atlantic Ocean with the Pacific Ocean. The canal cuts across the Isthmus of Panama and is a key conduit for international trade international maritime trade.
</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which class in Rome inherited there status

jonny [76]

Answer:

Patricians

Explanation:

Patricians- Wealthy landowners who held most of the power. They inherited their power and social status. They claimed their ancestry gave them the authority to make laws for Rome.

7 0

3 years ago

According to the Constitution the president draft laws and passes them. true or false

Lyrx [107]

Answer: False

Explanation: These laws basically have to go through congress and then be approved. The president makes sure there isn't any similar type of law that was enforced. Hope this helps!

3 0

2 years ago

Describe President Andrew Jackson's attitude toward native people as he authorized theforced removal of Indians to Western lands

REY [17]

Overall, Jackson didn’t like the Natives. To him they were an obstacle in the way of good farmland. He believed poor white men should be allowed to live and farm on the Natives land, which is what initially led to him trying to move them.
The Natives in the South refused to give up their land, which led to the Cherokee tribe going to the American supreme court. Even though the case ruled in the Natives favor (they cannot be forced to move), Jackson still forced them to move. The Trail of Tears itself was brutal for the Natives and even after they arrived out West, they didn’t get much government assistance. These instances show his lack of empathy towards the Natives.

7 0

2 years ago