According to lecture, the level of emission reductions pledged by individual countries at the paris climate agreements are sufficient to prevent dramatic climate change according to many scientists. <u>The statement is False.</u>
The issue is that many scientists believe the existing pledged emission reductions won't stop serious climate change.Leading the way in global efforts to combat climate change has been the EU. It played a key role in negotiating the Paris Agreement and continues to lead the world.
The EU presented its updated and improved NDC in December 2020, along with information to promote the ICTU (clearness, transparency, and understanding) of the NDC and a target to cut emissions by at least 55% from 1990 levels by 2030.
By working together, the EU and its Member States are committed to a legally-binding goal of a net domestic reduction of greenhouse gas emissions of at least 55% from 1990 to 2030.
To learn more about Paris Agreement click here
brainly.com/question/25525509
#SPJ4
3rd and 4th awnsers are correct
Solar power would, without doubt, be the most efficient type of power plant to build in this specific location. This is due to the fact that solar power produces no pollution in an environment. Also this type of alternative energy fits this communities resources due to the fact that the community receives primarily sun , a huge component in solar power, and little cloud coverage only increases the sun's power that much more. On the other hand, biomass needs things like wood, crops and alcohol fuels to burn in order to produce energy, some of which are not viable in this type of community because a place with little to no irrigation sources and an abundant amount of sunlight would be hard to produce any kind of natural aspect. Lastly, hydroelectric energy would not be a efficient of even viable choice because this community has no natural water available at hand to use for this alternative energy to function, and hydroelectric works primarily on a water storage.
