1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fiesta28 [93]
3 years ago
13

Pschological tests are often used to determine the hostility levels in people. High scores on the HLT pschological test correspo

nds to high hostility levels. Suppose that 26 college students, all with equally high HLT test scores, were separated into two groups randomly. Group 1 (10 students) was treated for high hostility levels by using Method A; whereas Group 2 (16 students) was treated for high hostility levels by using Method B. Both groups were treated for a period of 5 months, at which time all 26 students were again given the HLT test. Below is the summary data on the HLT test for the two groups.Group 1: sample mean is 79 and sample standard deviation is 7Group 2: sample mean is 84 and sample standard deviation is 8Compute a 95% confidence level for the difference in the means of the two treatment methods and select the best answer below. Assume that the independent random samples were taken from normal distributions and that the two population variances are equal.
Mathematics
1 answer:
algol133 years ago
4 0

Answer:  the correct answer is we are 95% confident that there is no statistically significant difference in the mean treatment  methods for hostility.  

Step-by-step explanation:

1)  Test for the equality of variances in the two groups to choose the appropriate t-test.  

H0: σ (1)^2 = σ (2)^2  

Ha: σ (1)^2 ≠ σ (2)^2  

Larger variance = 64  

Smaller variance = 49  

F = 1.30612  

Degrees of freedom 15 and 9  

Critical F from the table (with alpha=0.05) = 2.58  

Calculated F is smaller than critical F, so we use the pooled variance t-test.  

Sample 1 size 7  

Sample 2 size 8  

Sample 1 mean 79  

Sample 2 mean 84  

Sample 1 S.D. 7  

Sample 2 S.D. 8  

Pooled S.D = [(n1-1)s1^2+(n2-1)s2^2]/(n1+n2-2)

Pooled variance s = [(6)(49)+(7)(64))] / (13) =  (294+448)/13=742/13=57.076923

Pooled variance s^2 = 57.076923  

Standard error of difference in means = sqrt(1/n1+1/n2) times sqrt(s^2)  

Standard error of difference in means = (0.517549)(7.554927) = 3.910046 (denominator of t)  

Confidence interval = (mean1-mean2) +/- t SE  

t is the critical t with 24 degrees of freedom = 2.056  

(79 - 84) +/- (2.056) (3.910046)  

= (-13.04, 3.04)  

Interval encloses 0  

We are 95% confident that there is no statistically significant difference in the mean treatment  methods for hostility.  

You might be interested in
The angle of elevation from L to K measures 39°. If KL = 12, find JL. Round your answer to the nearest tenth.
WITCHER [35]
Answer is C=9.3

Pls find attached file

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The number of events is 29​, the number of trials is 298​, the claimed population proportion is​ 0.10, and the significance leve
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.0973 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{298}}}=-0.155  

p_v =2*P(Z  

And we can use excel to find the p value like this: "=2*NORM.DIST(-0.155;0;1;TRUE)"

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of interest is not significantly different from 0.1 .  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=298 represent the random sample taken

X=29 represent the events claimed

\hat p=\frac{29}{298}=0.0973 estimated proportion

p_o=0.1 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the proportion is 0.1 or no.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.0973 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{298}}}=-0.155  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z  

And we can use excel to find the p value like this: "=2*NORM.DIST(-0.155;0;1;TRUE)"

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of interest is not significantly different from 0.1 .  

We can do the test also in R with the following code:

> prop.test(29,298,p=0.1,alternative = c("two.sided"),conf.level = 1-0.05,correct = FALSE)

7 0
3 years ago
Suppose your friends parents invest $15,000 in an account paying 6% compounded annually. What will be the balance after 9 years
JulijaS [17]
A = 15000(1.04)6 .........You can put this into your calculator such that it becomes
A = $18,979.79
6 0
2 years ago
A cooler has 12 apple juices and 15 grape juices. 9 of the apple juices are sugar free and 5 of the grape juices are sugar free.
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

<em>The probability that it is grape juice, given that the juice is not sugar free is </em><em>0.769 or 76.9%</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

P(\text{Grape }|\text{ Not sugar free})=\dfrac{P(\text{Grape }\cap \text{ Not sugar free})}{P(\text{Not sugar free})}

A cooler has 12 apple juices and 15 grape juices. So total 27 juices are there.

Out of 12 apple juices, 9 of the apple juices are sugar free, so 3 are not sugar free.

Out of 15 grape juices, 5 of the grape juices are sugar free, so 10 are not sugar free. So,

P(\text{Grape }\cap \text{ Not sugar free})=\dfrac{10}{27}

P(\text{Not sugar free})=\dfrac{10+3}{27}=\dfrac{13}{27}

Putting the values,

P(\text{Grape }|\text{ Not sugar free})=\dfrac{P(\text{Grape }\cap \text{ Not sugar free})}{P(\text{Not sugar free})}=\dfrac{\frac{10}{27}}{\frac{13}{27}}=\dfrac{10}{13}=0.769

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
7/6 divided by 8 write in simplest form
quester [9]

Answer:  the  answer  is  7/48

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Two similar cylinders have a scale factor of (1.6/3). Find the ratio of their volumes.
    11·2 answers
  • the formula P = 2l + 2w ives the promoter P of a rectangular room with length l and width w. A rectangular living room is 26 ft
    14·1 answer
  • I have two children. One is a boy born on a Tuesday. What is the probability that I have two boys?
    9·2 answers
  • Need help with this, thank you!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • A line passes through the points (-6,4) abd (-2,2) which is the equation of the line
    11·1 answer
  • Triangle SQT is isosceles. The measure of angle STQ is 48°. Triangle S Q T is cut by perpendicular bisector T R. The lengths of
    8·2 answers
  • 2 5 7 Which algebraic expression represents the phrase "two times the quantity of a number minus 12"? 0 2y - 12 0 207-12) O 200
    11·1 answer
  • There are 35 competitors in a marathon. Sixty percent of these finished the race in under four hrs. How many did not?
    15·1 answer
  • 600 in.=_ft. thanks guys!!!
    8·2 answers
  • *2.) Which trinomial is equivalent to 4(x - 5)^2– 3(x - 2)?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!