False, you won't ALWAYS be able too.
Answer:
What would be the result? What additional information, if any, would you need to know to decide the case?
To determine who would win this case, we need to know two things:
- The non-compete agreement was supposed to last how many years, e.g. 1 or 2 years, maybe 3?
- When did Clifford Witter stopped working for Arthur Murray Dance Studios and when did he started to work for Fred Astaire Dancing Studios?
Most states consider non-compete agreements valid only if they last up to 2 or 3 years at most (which is considered a reasonable time). If Clifford started to work at Fred Astaire before the non-compete clause was over (assuming it lasted a reasonable time) then Arthur Murray would win. But if Clifford started to work at Fred Astaire after the non-compete clause was over, then there is nothing Arthur Murray can do to win the case.
<span>Read and follow all health and safety postings;Follow safe work practices;Help reduce work hazards;Report all occupational injuries and illnesses;Report hazardous conditions;Cooperate during an OSHA inspection; and<span>Exercise rights under the OSH Act in a responsible manner.</span></span>
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. The answer to the question you've asked is "A.True" I hope I've helped!~ Brainliest appreciated.
Answer:
Explanation:
Local government officials are outraged by unfunded mandates–regulations imposed from Washington but paid for locally. For example, Montanans must clean up the naturally-occurring arsenic in the Madison River because arsenic levels coming from geysers in Yellowstone Park exceed national standards. Yet, according to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates, a person would have to consume two liters of untreated water from the source and eat 6.5 grams of fish every day for 70 years to increase his or her risk of cancer by 1 in 10,000. Towns such as Aspen, Colorado, and Triumph, Idaho, are locked in an unending battle with the EPA because it claims that hazardous waste sites (places that have old mine tailings) must be cleaned up even though the communities do not feel the risks warrant the disruptions (Stroup 1996). Federal regulations to protect endangered species and wetlands have forced property owners to stop farming, logging, and building on their property (Lund 1995)
