The amendment 76 "aims to solve a problem that doesn’t exist." One, it only changes one word of the Colorado constitution from "every citizen" to "only citizen". Two, this would would go against the Colorado Votes Act which allows 17 who will be 18 to vote in primary elections. So, this can lead them not to vote when they do turn 18. Three, from what I can see for amendment 76 is supress voters. “What it’s going to do is it’s going to open the door for limited voting like voter ID requirements.” So, this amendment has no benefits that I can see and only causes more issues than it is "solving". So, I am against amendment 76 because it only supresses voters and can lead people to not vote.
Explanation:
Do you need more?
Individual writes a proposed amendment is called : Initiative
With initiative, an individual could propose a legislation at the polls of the law making power of the Government's branch, Including an amendment.
Answer:
B). 'Are there any other items of new business?'
Explanation:
As per the question, option B i.e. 'Are there any other items of new business?' exemplifies the response that could be categorized as 'irrelevant' using Sieburg and Larson's categories of confirming as well as dis-confirming responses. This response would be irrelevant to the context as it has no affiliation to their concern over the approaching deadline while the other responses would assist in expression of the concerns and encouragement to group in order to help them meet the deadline. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.