The answer to this is Babe
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(
−
∞
,
−
3
)
∪
(
7
,
∞
)
Solve each inequality separately, then combine them with the "or" operator, and then simplify if possible.
Let's start with the first inequality:
−
6
x
+
14
<
−
28
−
6
x
<
−
42
6
x
>
42
x
>
7
Now, we solve the second inequality:
9
x
+
15
<
−
12
9
x
<
−
27
x
<
−
3
Combining the two, we get:
x
<
−
3
or
x
>
7
This cannot be simplified, since the two solution regions do not overlap. The more formal way to write this (with interval notation) is:
(
−
∞
,
−
3
)
∪
(
7
,
∞
)
Hope this helps
Please give me Brainliest
You can construct a residual plot, plotting the x values against the values of the residuals; if there is a non-linear pattern in the residual plot then it would not be suitable to use linear regression, whilst if there is no noticeable pattern (ie. the points are randomly scattered) then the relationship is linear and a line of best fit could be appropriate.
Answer: a) $778.67 b) 19 years
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula you would use is
where a is the amount
n is the length of time
P is the principle
and r is the rate in decimal form
a)
b)
put your initial equation into a graphing calculator and use the table function to find that after 18 years it is worth 117 and in 19 years 86-
