- tamor
- arunriver
are two pilgrimage in province no. 1
When deciding whether or not she should buy an expensive sweater, Nadina's id, ego and superego would play a role. These three components of Nadina's personality would respectively play a role as follows:
i) Id- This component of personality is basically known as the pleasure seeking component, without any rationality, logical and regard for consequences. In Nadina's instance her id would play a role in urging her to give into her desire for pleasure and buy the expensive sweater.
ii) Ego- The ego is a part of personality, that serves as a mediator between the pleasure-seeking and irrational id, and practical, real world aspects. The ego is characterized by reasoning and consideration of real-life, pragmatic aspects in the decision making process. Here, Nadina's ego would push her to think of a way to buy the sweater and devise a plan so that this purchase will not set back her finances greatly. For instance, Nadina might decide that if she buys the sweater, she can make up for it and justify the expense by fewer meals out for the next two weeks.
iii) Superego- This aspect of personality includes our morals, beliefs and values which we imbibe from our parents, teachers and other authority figures in society. When making decisions, we take these morals and beliefs into consideration. In Nadina's case, her superego would urge her not to buy the sweater since she cannot afford it and probably needs to spend her money mostly on essentials instead (food, rent, education, children, etc.)
The Answer Would Be "B" .
It Would List All Specific Industries .
The state legislature could have refused to implement the decision, leading to a crisis in the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's authority.
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Preferred court docket case that held that federal courts should hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral obstacles, i.E. Redistricting, violates the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth modification of the charter.
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), became a landmark USA ideal court docket case in which the court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question beneath the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth amendment-based totally redistricting instances.
Learn more about legislature here brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: <span>suggestibility
</span><span>suggestibility in this context refers to the situation when people become much more inclined to change their memories with false information given by another people. In hypnosis, this process often triggered by some sort of sound or physical action.</span><span />
