1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariulka [41]
3 years ago
12

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

History
2 answers:
KIM [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Guilty.

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

uranmaximum [27]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

That contained suspects must be informed of their rights

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did southerners oppose henery clays american system
yan [13]
I hope this helps. The opposition which emerged to the American System had several foundations. The South opposed<span> federal financing of internal improvements because of the power that would be vested in the federal government, a power which could lead to that government abolishing slavery.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What happened in ww1
shepuryov [24]

Began with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and lasted until 1918. During the conflict, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire fought against Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, Romania, Japan and the United States.

5 0
3 years ago
WHO IS GOOD A HISTORY AND CAN DO THIS NO PLAGIARIZING IF YOU DO NOT PLAGIARIZE AND MAKE A GOOD ANSWER I WILL GIVE YOU THE BRAINL
Korolek [52]

Answer:

Many empires rose and fell between 2300 B.C. & 334 B.C. This includes the Babylonian and Hittite Empires which were located near the Middle East. The Babylonian Empire was found particularly in between two rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris, but also stretched to include Present-day Palestine, Present-day & Ancient Israel, North-east of Egypt, and terminating at the ancient city of Ur. The Hittite Empire, on the other hand, included most of present-day Turkey down to present-day northern border of Israel. In comparing both of the empires, we can see that they were able to conquer areas of their surrounding.

However, there are extreme differences between the two empires. One can be savage, in that they continued to war and pillage other civilizations. The Hittite empire fell apart during the rise of the Assryian Kingdom, which effectively removed the "staff of power" from the Hittite's, as well as suppress Babylon.

The Babylonian Empire, on the other hand, rose after the fall of the Assryian Empire, and was able to conquer most of what the Hittite's had. They ruled Northern Egypt, present-day Israel and Palestine, up to what would later be known as Constantinople, and going down to the Persian Gulf. The Babylonians were conquerors, who defeated and assimilated the people groups into the empire, though displacing them to discourage rebellion. They were overthrown later on by the Persians at the end of their empire.

Babylon and the Hittite were similar only in that they became empires, but the differences are great. They both took different approaches in trying to conquer the lands. One tried suppression, while the other did assimilation (though they did have to suppress in numerous occasions). In the end, they both were empires, and they both fell.

Explanation:

Man I hope you mark it as brainliest

7 0
3 years ago
How can effectivr state laws best support a fair election process? A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registrati
solniwko [45]

Answer:

A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places

Explanation:

It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.

It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.

It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.

It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What part of Maryland colony made laws
Irina-Kira [14]
In 1649 Maryland passed the Maryland Toleration Act, also known as the Act Concerning Religion, a law mandating religious tolerance for trinitarian Christians. Passed on 21 September 1649 by the assembly of the Maryland Colony, it was the first law requiring religious tolerance in the English North American colonies.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Define Human Systems
    6·1 answer
  • In the Battle of Guadalcanal, did the US fight offense or defense?
    12·1 answer
  • If a mineral has a luster like a metal, we describe it as
    8·1 answer
  • F you used this picture as part of a presentation on the construction of the Berlin Wall, it would
    6·2 answers
  • What organization gained popularity in reaction
    15·1 answer
  • I need help with this political cartoon, I don’t understand it.
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not an argument in support of subsidies?
    9·1 answer
  • Countries have the right to rule themselves how they see fit. This is also<br> known as<br> ???
    13·1 answer
  • Please help, I'll give brainliest!
    13·2 answers
  • Name of ships estevanico Morocco had
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!