3 years ago

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

History

2 answers:

KIM [24]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Guilty.

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

uranmaximum [27]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

That contained suspects must be informed of their rights

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Did the Dravidians come to the Indus Valley?

stellarik [79]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

in 7000 BC the Dravidians migrated to the Indus River Valley

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following actions may be taken by state governments?

vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

Issuing drivers licenses

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the aztec's religious beliefs weaken their environment

choli [55]

Religion permeated every aspect of Aztec life, no matter what one's station, from the highest-born emperor to the lowliest slave. The Aztecs worshipped hundreds of deities and honored them all in a variety of rituals and ceremonies, some featuring human sacrifice.

3 0

2 years ago

Hey, I need help :<br> farmers refused to do what in 1794<br> Thanks

timofeeve [1]

Move west because they couldn't pass the mississippi and thought the soil would be bad for farming

3 0

3 years ago

2 ways the federal government tried to regulate business in 1800s

anyanavicka [17]

the Sherman Act, and the commerce act.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers