3 years ago

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

History

2 answers:

KIM [24]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Guilty.

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

uranmaximum [27]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

That contained suspects must be informed of their rights

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What effect did globalization and

Molodets [167]

Increased is the correct answer

3 0

4 years ago

Which of the following is NOT true about civil rights

ankoles [38]

◕‿↼ Hey There!

Answer → I believe the Answer is the last one (rights are extended Only to Citizens)

(I not 100% sure this is the right answer but I'm pretty sure it is)

Correct me if I'm wrong

✨Hope This Helps!✨

4 0

3 years ago

Describe how Merrymount was a different kind of colony from other Puritan colonies and Virginia colony?

mariarad [96]

Sjsjsjsksjsjdjdjdjddkdjdjdk

8 0

3 years ago

if you were rewriting washingtons farewell address for a modern day audience, how would you change it?

Mariulka [41]

You can keep the middle but change the first paragraph

4 0

3 years ago

How would your life be different if electricity was never made for hu-man use? (Think about your hobbies, the way you learn in s

Serhud [2]

Answer:

1) No Ac

2) No video games

3) No electric lights

4) no online learning

5) no refrigerators

The list goes on, try to think about how technology and electricity help you in your day-to-day life

6 0

3 years ago