1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariulka [41]
3 years ago
12

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

History
2 answers:
KIM [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Guilty.

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

uranmaximum [27]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

That contained suspects must be informed of their rights

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What were the effects of the poison gas, according to the reporter? The French were victorious over the Germans. Soldiers suffer
iris [78.8K]

Answer:

B IS THE ANSWER!!!!!!

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HURRY !!!
kirill [66]

1=korea choice 3

2=choice 3

3=choice 2

4=choice 1

5=choice 3

6=choice 4

hope this helps:)

3 0
3 years ago
why were Americans shocked at the German invasion of Belgium, and why did Germany invade this small country?​
puteri [66]

Answer:

Germany declared war on France. To avoid the French fortifications along the French-German border, the troops had to cross Belgium and attack the French Army by the north. Of course, Belgians refused to let them through, so the Germans decided to enter by force and invaded Belgium on Aug. 4, 1914

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is the most likely tightest for including the statement at the top of the document
OLga [1]

can you post the document? otherwise i would love to help you :)

8 0
3 years ago
Why were the wealthy citizens of Italy likely to support and sponsor art?
gogolik [260]
The main reason why this was the case during the Renaissance was because art collection was a luxury, in that it required a lot of money. This made it advantageous for only the rich people to support it fully. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the Phoenicians contribute to written communication?
    10·1 answer
  • How did authoritarian governments emerge in the different countries of Spain, Germany, and Italy?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the most likely cause of the massive national debt accumulated under the Articles of Confederation?
    8·2 answers
  • What impact did the establishment of French and Dutch colonies in North America have on Native Americans?
    11·1 answer
  • The laws of Ancient Greece applied to __________.
    6·2 answers
  • What lead to the divers population of new york and New Jersey?
    11·1 answer
  • Does any one know how to hack quizzes so I can get all the answers right?
    14·2 answers
  • Which historical occurrence most significantly contributed to the Harlem Renaissance?
    6·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST FOR FIRST ANSWER
    9·1 answer
  • Two things that every professional PowerPoint presentation should have
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!