How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

History

2 answers:

KIM [24]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Guilty.

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

uranmaximum [27]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

That contained suspects must be informed of their rights

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Read the information below:

blagie [28]

Its the Gold Rush which occured in 1848.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The internal "city government" of various chinatowns was called the ________.

n200080 [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

"Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association" (CCBA) was established in 1883. The parent organization of the Chinese Community Center, the CCBA was founded in 1883 and has represented and served the needs of Chinese Americans in New York City ever since.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Looking at the opportunity costs of time, what will you do with your time today after school?

Nostrana [21]

Go to work so I can make money and Finish school work.

3 0

3 years ago

Who is credited with coining the term, "new south"

lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

Henry W. Grady