Obtain a customer signed statement acknowledging that an annuity transaction is not recommended if a customer decides to enter into an annuity transaction that is not based on the insurance producer's or insurer's recommendation.
<h3>Who is responsible for verifying your suitability?</h3>
The insurer or third party delegate authorized pursuant to section 224.
6(c) of Regulation 187 conducts a suitability review prior to the issuance of an insurance product or the effectuation of a sales transaction; and.
The insurer has procedures designed to prevent financial exploitation and abuse.
<h3>What factors are important considerations when determining suitability of an annuity sale?</h3>
Suitability Information Gathered by an Insurer
- Age.
- Annual income.
- Financial situation and needs, including the financial resources you're using to fund the annuity.
- Financial experience.
- Financial goals and objectives.
- Intended use of the annuity.
- Financial time horizon.
Learn more about insurance here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/15171641</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Answer:
C) III
- III. No, the policy was excluded from Joseph's estate.
Explanation:
It doesn't matter who pays the policy's premiums, what matters is who is the beneficiary of the policy. If the proceeds of the policy are paid to the insured's estate, then they are part of it, but if the proceeds are paid to another beneficiary, then they are not included in the estate.
Since Joseph's wife was the owner and beneficiary of the policy, the proceeds will be paid directly to her. The advantage here is that proceeds from the life insurance policy are not taxed as income, but if Joseph's state was larger than $5.43 million, then estate taxes might apply.
Answer:
Case 1 = $9,420
Case 2 = 0
Explanation:
Determining the amount of impairment loss is given below:-
Case 1
Impairment loss = Amortized cost - Fair value
= $41,640 - $32,220
= $9,420
Case 2
Impairment loss = Amortized cost - Fair value
= 91,800 - $102,220
= 0
Since, the fair value is higher than Amortized cost so the value of Impairment loss in case 2 is 0.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Fixed cost is
= $500,000 + $1,000,000
= $1,500,000
And, the marginal cost is
= $0.25 + $0.10
= $0.35 per paer
Now
as we know that
AFC = FC ÷ Q
Now for At 1,000,000 papers,
AFC is
= 1,500,000 ÷ 1,000,000
= $1.50/mo
At 800,000
, it would be
AFC = 1,500,000 ÷ 800,000
= $1.875/mo
MC = $0.35 per paper and the same is not changed
Now for break even, the average total cost is
ATC = AFC + AVC
ATC = FC ÷ Q + VC ÷ Q
VC = MC × Q
ATC = FC ÷ Q + MC
ATC = FC ÷ Q + 0.35
At Q = 1,000,000,
ATC = 1.50 + 0.35
ATC = $1.85
At Q = 800,000
, it would be
ATC = 1.875 + 0.35
= $2.225
As it can be seen that
The AFC changes from 1.50 to 1.875 which shows an increment of 0.375.
The MC remains constant or same at 0.35 as the printing and delivery costs per paper are remain same
And, The minimum amount that we must charge to break even rises i.e. from 1.85 to 2.225. That is a rise of 0.375
Answer
Option C
Decrease in cost $132,672
Explanation:
T<em>o determine the increase or decrease in costs associated with making, we will compare the relevant costs of the two options as follows</em>
<em> $</em>
Variable cost of making 10
Variable cost buying <u>14</u>
Savings in cost per from making 4
Total cost savings (decrease) 4 × 33,168 = $132,672
Decrease in cost as result of making =$132,672
