Answer:
I'm a four letter word, sometimes i'm the tragic <u>hero,</u> sometimes i'm the happy ending hero.
My first three letters signify a female,
my first two letters, signify a male,
I usually have conflicts with a villain,
Who am i?
Answer:
3315 / 58√3315
Explanation:
From the question, you said that
Cosec A = 58 / 7
Cosec = 1 / sin and
Sin = opp / hyp, this means that
Cosec = hyp / opp with hypotenuse being 58 and opposite angle being 7
Using Pythagoras theorem, we know that
adj² = hyp² - opp²
adj² = 58² - 7²
adj² = 3364 - 49
adj² = 3315
adj = √3315
cos A = √3315 / 58, On rationalising the denominator, we have
√3315 / 58 * √3315 / √3315 =
3315 / 58√3315
Answer:
It was the time, I had to choose to live with my mom or my dad. It seems simple right? Not when you have lived with both your parents your whole life up until this point. And especially difficult when your siblings have made their decision. Jack and Ella are with my dad, and Jake and Maddie were with my mom. I looked further into the room and could see the grandfather clock continued to move as my mind froze. I could go with my mom, live with two of my older siblings and live a somewhat similar life to mine now. Or, I could live with my dad and restart. Maybe I could be outgoing for once. But as I thought about it more, it just made the decision harder.
Explanation:
The correct answer should be Edith Wharton.
Ellen Glasgow, Ella Cather, and Mary J. Holmes dealt with other topics such as world war 1, slavery, civil war, life in the south, and other things while Edith Wharton wrote about social lives.
Answer: In the first paragraph, the narraraor seeks to establish his credibility, as if he expects the reader to believe that his especially acute sense of hearing makes him more believable than an ordinary observer. The narrarator purports that his calm, detailed account will be accepted as truthful, despite some irrational decisions and actions. The narrarator's attention to detail clues the reader to "expect the unexpected" in terms of details the narrator's heightened senses reveal.
In the third paragraph, the narrator reveals that he has, in fact, killed the old man. We are hearing the account of a murderer rationalizing his actions, as if this is what anyone with his keen perception and ability to carry out this elelaborate scheme would have done. The reader realizes that this narrator is crazy, but we are still listening, but we can intrpret his intentions as absolutely irrational. Speaking corageously to the man by day, sneaking stealthily into his bedroom by night.
The fourth paragraph confirms the reader's suspicions that the narator is beyond belief: feeling the extent of his own powers. And even when he thinks the old man may have heard him, he persists in his incredibly slow, deliberate intention to intrude into the man's bedroom-- hoping to see what he has defined as Evil Eye-- as if the narrator has a duty to eliminate something that vexes only him. Our impression must be that this narrator can't escape the consequences of his actions.
