This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that yes, you would have been satisfied with the results of Napoleon’s actions, since most of the profits when to this class of people.
I think she wrote the book Uncle Tom's Cabin
Hamilton's next objective was to create a Bank of the United States, modeled after the Bank of England. A national bank would collect taxes, hold government funds, and make loans to the government and borrowers. One criticism directed against the bank was "unrepublican"--it would encourage speculation and corruption. The bank was also opposed on constitutional grounds. Adopting a position known as "strict constructionism," Thomas Jefferson and James Madison charged that a national bank was unconstitutional since the Constitution did not specifically give Congress the power to create a bank.
Hamilton responded to the charge that a bank was unconstitutional by formulating the doctrine of "implied powers." He argued that Congress had the power to create a bank because the Constitution granted the federal government authority to do anything "necessary and proper" to carry out its constitutional functions (in this case its fiscal duties).
In 1791, Congress passed a bill creating a national bank for a term of 20 years, leaving the question of the bank's constitutionality up to President Washington. The president reluctantly decided to sign the measure out of a conviction that a bank was necessary for the nation's financial well-being.
In my view, correct answer is: This 1863 poster is recruiting African Americans to help <span>(2)assist in the efforts of the Underground Railroad.</span>
Explanation:
There are many different trains of thought that lead Americans to their own mindset about the aid of Middle Eastern independence. Generally speaking, there are many people who believe that the United States should be the Police of the world or the hero of smaller countries and help them since they have the power to do so. Others believe that the United States has no rights of interfering in foreign affairs and should mind their own business. There are those who just don't agree with the idea of sending kids to die for other countries as well, no matter why.