1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BigorU [14]
3 years ago
9

Do you agree or disagree with Howard Becker that negative labels can have an impact on crime? Why?

History
2 answers:
vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: I agree.

Explanation:

Howard Becker, one of the most well-known labeling theorists, believed deviance was a social construct that established the rules that were applied to specific people so they could be labeled as outsiders.

In this theory, crime arises as people in power label some behaviors as unlawful. And people who engage in those behaviors, and became labeled as deviants, eventually internalize that label and become even more attached to the behavior deemed as deviant. Maybe, if they got a chance to be treated as people regardless of their crimes, they could be able to refrain from behaviors considered deviant.

lesya [120]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I agree because the wrong label can trigger the wrong person and that person will do a hatred crime.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the time period in which the woodland indian culture flourished?
Yuri [45]
The woodland period which was from 100 BCE to the time Europeans reached the eastern part of the Americas.
8 0
4 years ago
What does the cartoon demonstrate
Korvikt [17]

The answer would be B.


5 0
3 years ago
The Hindu leader of the Indian independence movement who practiced nonviolent resistance was
Nitella [24]

Answer:

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

4 0
3 years ago
describe a difference between the political, religious, or economic structures in Western Europe and Eastern Europe during the M
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

Explanation: Many of the western european and eastern europeans religious divides happened thru the protestant reformation which made catholicism no longer the dominant religion. The eastern europeans consited of islamics (the balkans were controlled by the ottomans) and the orthodox russians. The western european religions were mainly catholic or orthodox, with sweeden, parts of the holy roman empire, and britian being protestant and ireland and spain (the house of hasburgs controlled spain the netherlands and part of austria and were the dominant power).

6 0
3 years ago
1. Was “labor violence” inevitable and unavoidable ? What factors played into causing much of the confrontation between unions a
san4es73 [151]

Labor unrest and confrontations between labor unions and employers in the United States has been present basically since the 19th century, as a response to the impact of the Industrial Revolution. National labor unions began in the post Civil War era and one of the first documented started operating in the 1880's, when most of the unrest began in response to the abuse and unfair treatment and lack of legal protection for workers against the big companies. Many of the industries were hit hard by the formation of these unions, but none more than the railroad and steel industries. 1. Labor violence could have been prevented and could have been avoided if: a) laws had been passed to protect workers better and b) If part of the plan of employers and officials to disband unions had not been to introduce spies and agitators into the unions´ ranks to create unrest so that the union would be blamed for causing trouble. 2. The unions were created to prevent the abuse of employers on workers on the topics of salary, worker´s unfair replacement, compensations. But also, to create a monopoly, meaning, workers wanted to ensure that companies could not simply get rid of workers from the union to replace them with non-unionized laborers. Usually these unions used strikes to put forth their demands and in many ocassions ended up attacking and killing strikebreakers and replacement workers instead of the employers themselves. 3. Because the formation of unions meant that workers were for the first time not willing to simply follow the instructions and demands of a company. They began joining together in an attempt to demand better working conditions, something companies did not have to face up until then. Also, the result of these constant strikes and the violence forced the state and national governments to take measures and pass laws that in the end did not benefit their companies.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An agreement to count slaves as 3/5 of a person was related to
    14·1 answer
  • Aristarchus was an astronomer who taught that the sun was
    14·2 answers
  • What is deregulation and how did it affect certain industries in the 1980s?
    9·1 answer
  • Read the quotation from Booker T. Washington's 1895 Atlanta Compromise Speech.
    7·2 answers
  • What effect did the Russian Revolution of 1917 have on Russia's role in World
    6·1 answer
  • What does western political thought mean?
    14·1 answer
  • How do a traditional economy, a market economy,<br> a command economy, and a mixed economy differ?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did German military leaders return Lenin to Russia?
    12·1 answer
  • Critical Thinking:
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following elements of the US Constitution has its roots in the English Bill of Rights?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!