I’m so sorry if it’s wrong but I believe it’s either between... the first option- move toward more or the 3rd option- cautiously embraced. But if I were to choose which one I think I would go with the 1st option as my answer
Answer: move toward more
Explanation: Because of nearly all composers use dissonance in their music. Without dissonance, there would be no tension and release in music and it would all be VERY boring and bland. Dissonances are nothing new at all and certainly not restricted to the 20th century; in the 14th and 15th centuries these could be quite harsh and not always resolved in the way we would expect today.
Dissonance adds expression to music and as composers' techniques became more and more sophisticated, so did the harmonic language. Dissonance can be used for musical 'colour' and to create extreme tension and drama in music.
In short, composers in the 20th (and 21st) century used dissonance for very similar reasons to composers in every other century.
According to yahoo.com
They wrote about slavery from the standpoint of the Bible (Barnes opposed slavery, while Thornwell, a Southerner, supported it).
I think the answer is A
Hope it helps
The goal was to tell the rest of the world (mainly the Europeans) that the United States has official borders and that they could no longer colonize in the borders.
It also told the Europeans that the U.S would not interfere with their colonies or Europe itself.
