Answer:
<h3>look for contradictions and errors in a text very critically.</h3>
Explanation:
- The mechanism of Believing and Doubting Game makes readers look into the critical side of texts without polarization. It helps the readers to see the contradicting parts of the tests.
- Playing the Believing and Doubting Game while analyzing text helps a reader to look for contradictions and errors in a text very critically. It helps the readers to form their own opinions regarding certain concrete evidences.
You could read Chapter Nineteen for the answer
i would chose A. It captures the feeling that beauty in nature is fleeting.
Answer:
The statement that best summarizes the central idea of this paragraph is 3. signs of simian fever and Ebola can be similar.
Explanation:
We can reach a conclusion through elimination. The first option is incorrect because the test does not claim the confirmation did not happen because the animal was dead. If the animal had had a bloody interior, Ebola would have been confirmed. So, dead specimens are not the reason why it is difficult to identify Ebola.
Number 2 is subjective, giving us an opinion that at no moment was suggested or stated in the paragraph. We cannot say the central idea of this text is that necropsies are boring.
Number 3 is the correct option. The reason why the woman was unable to confirm if the monkey had died of Ebola was because the signs she found could also be due to simian fever. Since they are similar, she could not confirm the disease visually.
Number 4 is incorrect. Ebola does not have unusual effects. Its effects are known and specific. Again, the reason behind the difficulty was the similarity of signs between the two diseases.
