Answer: Spanish Colonization
Explanation:
Even though Mexico is in North America, it was colonized by the Spanish who also colonized most of South and Central America. This is in contrast to both Canada and the United States which were colonized by the British.
The Spanish had a policy of assimilating indigenes into Spanish Culture as much as possible leading to a large number of intermarriage. This led to the many groups in Spanish territories having similar attributes such as the speaking of Spanish, religion mostly being Catholicism and various other attributes.
This is why Mexico is closer to countries in South America than North.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
There are 2. The Canadian Horseshoe Falls (the bigger one) and the American falls (smaller).
Hope that helps
It would be the Boxer Rebellion (1898-1901) where there was a rebellion in Imperial China against the foreigners (Western nations) and imperial forces (Qing Dynasty).
The correct answer is The Latin economy was growing considerably in 1900, but they were still very dependent on other non-Latin countries.
Between 1950 and 1980, Latin America experienced rapid growth. During this period, the product expanded at an annual rate of 5.8% with per capita increases of 3% per year on average. Table 1 provides details. The best performance is clearly that of Brazil, whose participation regional product increase from less than a quarter to more than than a third. At the other extreme are two groups. One is the Southern Cone (Argentina, Chile and Uruguay) whose position as leader in the region in 1950 was worn. The other stragglers include a variety of smaller countries, some in Central America. Latin America's average performance after World War II is impressive when compared to the following facts. The goal of Alliance for Progress, implemented in 1961, was an annual growth rate of 2% in per capita terms. The growth of per capita income capita in Europe as a result of the Industrial Revolution was 1.3% from 1850 to 1900 and 1.4% between 1900 and 1950. The economic growth of the long term in the United States was 1.8% per year. However, two factors contributed to overshadow the performance of the Latin America between 1950 and 1980. One is the dramatic reversal of this performance in the 1980s. Latin America has gone back in this decade, with the product falling at the rate of 1.4%, as recorded in table 1. Until 1988, with the exception of Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Dominican Republic, the pm per capita of all countries in the region had fallen below the level 1980. Venezuela, Nicaragua and EI Salvador showed levels below those achieved in 1960. The 1980s were truly a lost decade. Consequently, previous progress is underestimated.
Answer:
the two examples
Explanation:
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government.
The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.