Answer:
Question 1: Actually, he did not. If he did export and spread the ideals of the Revolution, why did he appoint his brothers and other people to high points in government? Apart from that, they held the position of kings and monarchs which is opposite to the ideals of the Revolution. It should be that the people have the right to decide for themselves but they didn’t. Instead, they lived in fear and rebelled against him.
Question 2: Both revolutions started rather moderately, with people demanding more representation in government. Neither gained the full support of everyone in the respective nations either, as evidenced by Loyalists in the US and counterrevolutions in areas like the Vendee in France. In France, the revolution became more radical and ideological, taking Enlightenment ideals and rationalism to the extreme. The revolution in France also led to the dictatorship of Napoleon and the restoration is Bourbon monarchs, so ultimately a return to the status quo, while the American Revolution was successful in gaining American independence. Furthermore, the French Revolution was fought in France while the American Revolution was fought in the colonies of England and never sought to completely depose George III, just remove his control of the colonies.
The answer to your problem must be False
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
there are a number of reasons and small incidents before the happening of historical event. to understand a particular historical event, the historians must see the circumstances and reasons due to which the historical event occurs. There are various reasons behind the historical event so it is necessary for the historian to see that reasons in order to fully understand the event.
Answer:
Hope this helps!
Explanation:
Between 1600 and 1800, which most likely changed in the economy of the mid-Atlantic/Middle colonies?
Answer:
It was a global vision whereby people had freedom of speech, of religion, freedom from want and fear.
Explanation:
