The cash flow (payment or receipt) made for a given period or set of periods. The present value, PV, of a series of cash flows is the present value, at time 0, of the sum of the present values of all cash flows, CF. We start with the formula for PV of a future value ( FV) single lump sum at time n and interest rate.
Yw and pls mark me as brainiest
Answer:
1) The transaction cost of both he bank deposit and mutual fund are almost equal as transaction in both can be made by visiting a branch or using internet banking or brokering.
2) The risk for the bank deposits are lower thank mutual funds because even thought the mutual fund is highly diversified, its value can still decline because of changes in market or some market crash like the 2008 recession, where as the money in the bank remains intact
3) The liquidity is higher for bank deposits because money can be withdrawn instantly, whenever the depositor wants, where as the liquidity for mutual funds is a bit lower as it takes a couple of business days to make transactions.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>The answer is 60.</em>
Explanation:
<em>The First step in solving the example given, is to recall the following steps to be taken </em>
<em>The standard deviation of return on investment A =10%</em>
<em>The standard deviation of return on investment B =5%</em>
<em>The co-variance of returns both on A and B =.0030</em>
<em>The next step is as follows</em>
<em>co-variance = correlation </em>
<em>.0030 (.05 x .10) = 60</em>
<em>Therefore the correlation coefficient between the returns of A and B is 60</em>
Answer:
if ur happy then ig I could say ur successful
if made it to the top I could say ur successful
if u reached the destination if ur dream I would say ur successful
Answer: Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
A lurking variable is an unknown explanatory or independent variable that is not considered in a study, but this variable affects the results of the study. These variables will cause the results of the research to be biased or misleading. These variables sometimes falsely indicate a strong relationship between the variables or sometimes it hides the true relationship between the response and explanatory variable.