1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elden [556K]
2 years ago
8

What problems might arise from appointing a dictator during times of crisis.

History
1 answer:
zalisa [80]2 years ago
6 0
When appointing a dictator, chances are he or she will rule the nation according to his own will. Therefore, the problem that might arise from appointing a dictator during times of crisis is that, the people's voice and freedom would easily be taken away from them. Hope this answer helps. Have a great day!
You might be interested in
Who translated the hebrew bible and the greek books of the new testament into latin?
Papessa [141]
I'm pretty sure it was St Jerome
7 0
3 years ago
Was the government involved with the kennedy assination
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

No. The government had nothing to do with the Kennedy assassination.

4 0
2 years ago
what do President Johnson's beliefs and actions show you about the challenges that African Americans would still face, especiall
user100 [1]

Answer:

Blacks were denied any role in the process.

Explanation:

In 1865 President Andrew Johnson implemented a plan of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free hand in regulating the transition from slavery to freedom and offered no role to blacks in the politics of the South.

3 0
3 years ago
____ ______ was a well-known composer of the baroque period<br><br> its not johann.
Fed [463]

the answer could be Henry Purcell

7 0
3 years ago
How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar
Butoxors [25]

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the dictator of iraq in the 1990
    13·2 answers
  • Q: Part of the American colonists' anger towards Britain prior to the American Revolution stemmed from the fact that
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not part of Johnson's strategy for fighting the war in Vietnam?:
    8·1 answer
  • How did Islamic civilization spread to encompass such an extensive empire?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the English victory of the french and Indian war?
    5·1 answer
  • How was the Inca empire impacted by European exploration and colonization?
    15·2 answers
  • What are some of the common elements in the process of European state building? What specific measures did the national monarchi
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the shah of Iran's government collapse in 1979?
    14·1 answer
  • A significant accomplishment of the Second Continental Congress<br> in 1778 was?
    7·2 answers
  • What does England gain as a result of the war?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!