Someone important...
hahaha, sorry
John D. Rockefeller was an American business magnate and philanthropist in the oil industry. He is considered to be the wealthiest American, and the richest in modern history.
P.S. a simple google search would give you the answer ;)
<h3>Trade and industry flourished in the 16th century, making more England more prosperous and improving the standard of living of the upper and middle classes. However,the lower classes did not benefit much and did not always have enough food.</h3>
Answer:
Check Explanation.
Explanation:
Fannie Lou Hamer was an activist and was born in the year 1917, she died in the year 1977. Anne moody was an author (she was the one that wrote " The coming of age in Mississippi'' and an activist. Anne moody was born on the 15th day of September, 1940 and died on the 5th of February, In the year 2015.
Both Fannie Lou Hamer and Anne moody were activists that were discriminated because of the colour of their skin(that is race) because they are both African-Americans and they both fought for equality.
The difference between Fannie Lou Hamer and Anne moody was that Fannie Lou Hamer campaigned against race discrimination by using political means such as registration of voters and she belonged to Freedom democratic party WHILE Anne moody was much more of an author and civil Rights activist which is not attached to any political party.
Answer:
The 1920s were a period of dramatic changes. More than half of all Americans now lived in cities and the growing affordability of the automobile made people more mobile than ever. Although the decade was known as the era of the Charleston dance craze, jazz, and flapper fashions, in many respects it was also quite conservative. At the same time as hemlines went up and moral values seemed to decline, the nation saw the end of its open immigration policy, the revival of the Ku Klux Klan, and the trial of a Tennessee high‐school teacher for teaching evolution.
The Red Scare and immigration policy. In the first few years after World War I, the country experienced a brief period of antiradical hysteria known as the Red Scare. Widespread labor unrest in 1919, combined with a wave of bombings, the Communists in power in Russia, and the short‐lived Communist revolt in Hungary, fed the fear that the United States was also on the verge of revolution. Under the direction of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, thousands of suspected radicals were arrested in 1919 and 1920; those that were aliens were deported. Although the Red Scare faded quickly after 1920, it strengthened the widespread belief in a strong connection between foreigners and radicalism. The bias against foreigners was exemplified in the Sacco and Vanzetti trial. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were Italian‐born, self‐admitted anarchists who, in 1920, were indicted for robbery and murder in Massachusetts; they were found guilty and sentenced to death in July 1921. Their supporters claimed that they were convicted for their ethnic background and beliefs rather than on conclusive evidence. Sacco and Vanzetti were executed in August 1927 after all their appeals were exhausted.
Explanation:
--- :)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,
However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."
We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.
The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.
