Answer:
disarray and interruption
Explanation:
- In the above context, the words, 'disorder and disruption are used to show the extent to which the governments were in a mess.
- The words that can replace this words without changing the meaning are disarray and interruption.
- disarray means being in a state or disorderliness, being disorganised.
- Interruption means an action that cuts in into something.
In writing a speech you must consider the structure of the essay, Hence, the structure of the speech should be considered;
- The Introduction
- The body
- The conclusion
Now consider the writing points and incorporate them. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a speech?</h3>
Generally,speech is simply defined as words and phrases that convey meaning and emotion.
In conclusion, The points
a. A brief historical background on the party
b. A general description of your party’s philosophy is regarding the role of government in American life
c. Choose two major issues (except immigration and military spending) and describe your party’s position
d. An explanation of how your party justifies its position
Should be a part of the body of the speech
Read more about speech
brainly.com/question/18560193
#SPJ1
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A tradeoff is a compromise or an exchange
Assisted suicide or euthanasia
is a serious issue and therefor the regarding it is very strict. To administer
euthanasia in Oregon according to the 1997 death with Dignity law, the patient
first and before all be terminally ill with less then 6 months to live and aware
of all other alternatives available to him. He must request in two times in
oral form and once in a written form while also convincing two doctors and not
having depression. After doing all that and waiting 15 days, the patient will
be granted his wish.
Federalism, although having both positives and negatives, has clearly
harmed the democratic process in the United States, as can be seen on
the impact of frameworks and strategies setup at the onset, and the
impact it has on influencing public policy towards interests as opposed
to logic.
