Cattell developed the 16PF test.
By their behavior and how the react and understand to everyday life from other people.
Scientists should definitely use evidence - and they collect this evidence though especially designed experiments. Based on their data and assumptions they build models which they then test, but they can base their conclusions based on the models too.
What they should not do is based the conclusions on opinions, because opinions are not imparcial- they can state them as opinions, but not as conclusions.
<span />
Frances, like most people in her culture, avoids making eye contact with strangers. A conventionalist would call the action of making eye contact with strangers <u>impermissible.</u>
Conventionalists adhere to a belief that the principles and values, moral rules, social expectations and etiquette, are a creation of human society and therefore not immutable or universal; rather, they are specific to a particular culture.
For example, the prohibition against murder or stealing are not universal laws, applicable to all societies, but are created over time through agreements -implicit or explicit- between members of society.
Where making eye contact with strangers is against the norm, a conventionalist would argue that it is impermissible to commit that particular action.
To learn more about conventionalists: brainly.com/question/24316302
#SPJ4
I hope this helps number 12. b,I'm actually stuck on number 11
