Your answer would be A because gross pay= 8.50$ times the number of hours you work.
Answer:
(A) Yes, since the test statistic is in the rejection region defined by the critical value, reject the null. The claim is the alternative, so the claim is supported.
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: The wait time before a call is answered by a service representative is 3.3 minutes.
Alternate hypothesis: The wait time before a call is answered by a service representative is less than 3.3 minutes.
Test statistic (t) = (sample mean - population mean) ÷ sd/√n
sample mean = 3.24 minutes
population mean = 3.3 minutes
sd = 0.4 minutes
n = 62
degree of freedom = n - 1 = 62 - 1 = 71
significance level = 0.08
t = (3.24 - 3.3) ÷ 0.4/√62 = -0.06 ÷ 005 = -1.2
The test is a one-tailed test. The critical value corresponding to 61 degrees of freedom and 0.08 significance level is 1.654
Conclusion:
Reject the null hypothesis because the test statistic -1.2 is in the rejection region of the critical value 1.654. The claim is contained in the alternative hypothesis, so it is supported.
Think of this as a proportion: 2.4 is to 100, as 34 is to L ("L" for "Long piece.")
Cross multiply to get 2.4 L = 3400, then divide both sides by 2.4 to be left with
L = 3400/2.4, so
L = 1416.666...
So the longer piece of wood is 1,416.66... inches long.
Hope this helps!!:)
X - y = -3
Move constant to the left by adding its opposite to both sides
x - y + 3 = -3 + 3
The sum of two opposites equals
your answer would be: x - y + 3 = 0
A all squares have the sides
