Answer:
The input of land, labor, and capital. APEX
Answer:
Option d is the right one.
Explanation:
- Marginal research or analysis to optimize future gains as a decision-making method. In comparison to the expenses incurred by this same behavior, it calculates added benefits. The illustration described demonstrates that the marginal gain is smaller than that of the marginal cost.
- This involves purchasing goods until the marginal gain is equal to the marginal cost.
The other options aren't sufficient for the scenario provided. But that will be the best alternative for option d.
Answer and Explanation:
By publishing the "List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor" the American government is able to raise awareness among the population that, although child labor is something inconceivable in American society, it still happens with great intensity in various places around the world. This allows the population to become aware of this situation and to stop buying products produced by companies that finance and allow child labor to happen. When they stop using these products, companies suffer a decrease in demand, which can cause significant changes in the production and in the lives of children who need to work.
While consumer pressure at companies that allow child labor is effective, pressure from political and commercial authorities is more effective in bringing about change and ensuring the protection of children, as these authorities can promote severe punishments for those who allow this to happen.
Answer:
d. An increase in the value of the pound by 0.6 percent
Explanation:
Given :
Regression equation : 
Change company estimates that 
to be 0.0 and the value of 
to be 0.6.
Now, ebp = 0.6 x inf + μt ----------------- 
When Inf = 1 (assume that the error term is 0)
ebp = 0.6 x 1 = 0.6
That is it is an increase in the value of pound by 0.6% with the one unit increase in the 
.
Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Answer:
Explanation:
A professional buyer usually has uses many different tactics in a meeting/negotiation in order to get the best price possible or a price that largely favors them as a buyer. Two of these tactics would be to point out negative aspects of the asset being sold while another one would be a take-it-or-leave-it offer. With both of these tactics, the buyer tries to make the asset seem as not worth its asking price and then with the offer, the buyer is making it seem as though the seller will not receive a better offer and tries to make them accept the offer out of fear of missing out on the sale. Personally, the best way I would respond to both of these tactics would be to continuously point out the positive aspects of the asset and stay firm to your initial/needed price point.
