The claim that existentialism leaves a moral vacuum is a common one against this philosophy, and one that Sartre was aware of. Existentialism places freedom at the centre of human experience, and this includes the freedom from traditional moral views, which at first glance, could be worrisome for some people.
However, getting rid of moral traditions imposed by society is a choice: the choice to define your own morality. And by defining this morality, you replace old values with new ones. Therefore, there is no vacuum as there is no "empty space." When some social rules are removed from our ethical code, some other personal rules replace them. Sartre places great value on "authenticity." This is the creation of our own self in freedom. Through authenticity and freedom, we design ourselves, both as individuals and in society. Existentialism, therefore, does not imply the loss of ethics (and therefore, the lack of morals), but only the creation of a new ethics based on individual freedom and authenticity.
Answer: classical poetry most commonly consist of a combination of thought and also passion
Explanation:
Hope that helps
though tom and boo are similar when it comes to being humble , tom is African American which back then wasn't the best time to be African american. Tom also had to go to court in front of almost the whole town whereas boo didn't because of the fact that he had been inside his house away from everyone else almost his whole life.
If you are using a sentence from the passage given, you have to put it in quotes and mention which paragraph it’s from.
For example:
“Sentence from prompt” (paragraph 1)
Hope this helps
The sentence that contains a misplaced modifier is D) In support of the team, the Morenos saw fans with posters. <em>In support of the team </em>is misplaced, because the way it is written now, it means that it refers to the Morenos, when in fact it refers to the fans with posters.
The correct sentence would be:
The Morenos saw fans with posters in support of the team.
