All categories

3 years ago

Many states refused to ratify the constitution unless

2 answers:

5 0

I think you forgot to add some detail but based on my research, the correct answer to this question is "A Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution." Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.

Liono4ka [1.6K]3 years ago

4 0

Many states refused to ratify the constitution unless an assurance of amendments was given that it will be immediately proposed in the constitution.

Further Explanations:

Congress on 25 May, 1787 introduced a plan to draft new constitution in the constitutional convention held at Independence hall of Philadelphia. After a long debate moderated by President George Washington, the new constitution came into existence on 17th September , 1787 which was approved by 38 out of 41 delegates available at the cessation of the convention. As dictated in Article VII, the document will become binding only when it will be rectified by 9 out of 13 states .

By 7th December five territories - Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut agreed to approve it while other opposed stating the lack of constitutional protection of basic political rights like liberty of religion, speech and press. Later by February 1788, they reached a compromise with an assurance that amendment would be promptly proposed. Massachusetts was the first to approve it, later accompanied by Maryland and South Carolina. New Hampshire was the 9th state to approve it on 21 June and was acknowledged that government under U.S constitution would commence on March 4, 1789. In June, Virginia approved the constitution.New York approved it in July.

On 29th May, 1790 Rhode Island ratified it by 2 votes and at last 13 colonies also joined in making U.S constitution the oldest written constitution.

Learn More

1. How many states had to vote for the constitution to approve it?brainly.com/question/1218366

2. According to the constitution, the judicial branch of the federal government is headed by?brainly.com/question/10065176

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: U.S Constitution

Keywords: Philadelphia. George Washington, Article VII, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina. New Hampshire

You might be interested in

Which do historians agree are reasons for studying history?

KiRa [710]

D. it makes up better thinkers

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of these is not something soldiers were expected to do when they were not fighting or migrating to another location?

seraphim [82]

A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.

When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.

The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).

Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.

Hope this helps.

-Northstar

5 0

2 years ago

Why is the divine comedy important to world history?

Vesna [10]

The importance is huge! it is considered one of the greatest works of European literature. Written by Italian poet Dante Alighieri (1265–1321), The Divine Comedy speaks about many things important for religious intances like the Christian concept of the place where sinners go after death and purgatory the region between hell and heaven the place where the righteous go after death. The Divine Comedy was the first well-received epic (long narrative) poem written in Italian rather than Latin.

6 0

2 years ago

Explain the different ways in which an autocracy and a democracy exercise authority

Alex_Xolod [135]

Autocracy is a government where all the power rests in one person who has all the power and makes all the decisions. And that person is not picked by the people. Democracy is a government where the power is held by the people, the masses.

hope I helped some :)

5 0

2 years ago

The time has come to purchase your parking pass for school. The student parking lot consists of 6

ra1l [238]

Answer:

Explanation:

34x6 = 204

204-4=200

5 0

2 years ago