Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
People tried to change the minds of other by pathos, evoking feelings, brainwashing the youth which was the next generation, protest/marches, and unification
Answer:
Physical barrier
Explanation:
A physical barrier is any barrier to communication that is caused by a natural and/or environmental condition and affects how the communication when sending a message to a receiver. In this case, the noise from the people talking behind Raul acts as a environmental condition and is affected the way in which information from the speaker gets to Raul.
When analyzing the life cycle for a neighborhood, stability stage is characterized by equilibrium of supply and demand.
Stability way that you feel satisfied with what you have. you might need more, however you perceive your current situation to be ok, to be doable, to provide you comfort and pleasure. It provides fulfillment. Consider the main areas of your existence – your work, your relationships, and your current situation.The great, country, or degree of being stable: which include. a : the energy to stand or undergo : firmness. b : the property of a body that causes it while disturbed from a condition of equilibrium or constant motion to develop forces or moments that repair the original situation. Most importantly, stability reduces pressure and anxiety. You know what to anticipate on any given day and you could experience especially confident you can deal with whatever occurs. Stress and anxiety are major triggers for most people and minimizing them, mainly early on, makes it simpler to stay on track. balance implies personality traits present during infancy endure throughout the lifespan. In contrast, change theorists argue that personalities are changed through interactions with family, experiences at college, and acculturation.
Learn more about Stability here:-
brainly.com/question/1296107
#SPJ4
Answer:
yes.
Explanation:
this is because the scientific explanation behind the amount of carbon hydrate in which is used in this velocitific experiment, is overdue.
