Why would government observers complain that the filibuster allowed a minority to control the Senate

1 answer:

ioda2 years ago

7 0

Because from an outside prospective, a filibuster could virtually put the entire senate into a deadlock from a minority delaying or blocking a vote all together. This also means that in order to end a filibuster, you would require a “cloture vote” which is a super majority (67 out of the 100 senators) essentially taking power away from the majority.

You might be interested in

Describe babe Ruth anwars

Elina [12.6K]

Wait what more info

8 0

2 years ago

Any idea what the answer could be? (I'm dumb sorry haha)

Feliz [49]

I believe it would be #3 “Consent of the governed”

6 0

2 years ago

Which Parliamentary leader held great power during the period without a king?

madreJ [45]

Answer:

I think so that "Oliver Cromwell ".

5 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

President Roosevelt's first reaction to upon Sinclair's the jungle is best described as

Bess [88]

There's many answers for this question, as long as it's a similar word to disbelief. President Roosevelt's reaction was pretty much thinking, "This is unbelievable." So therefore, you can put disbelief or distrust.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Once the jury selection process is complete then the

olga55 [171]

The correct answer is "the trial will begin."

Explanation:

The jury is always selected before a trial by jury is started. The jury is selected by both the plaintiff and defendants lawyers. They are selected by answering numerous questions and each lawyer has the chance to refuse a juror. The jury is made up of people from all backgrounds and the jury that is chosen should not be biased in any way to the defendant.

The verdict will be read at the end of the trial by the jury foreman.

Learn more about a jury at brainly.com/question/1851817

#LearnwithBrainly

7 0

2 years ago