In paragraph two, the Supreme Court argued the separation of races does not make one race <u>inferior</u>.
The reason why the Court ruled in favor of segregation was because it argued that it cannot change the social dynamics of race.
<h3>What happened in Plessy v. Ferguson?</h3>
In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that it was wrong to assume that segregation meant that one race was superior and that the other one was inferior.
It therefore ruled in favor of segregation with the argument that racial and physical instincts cannot be removed by legislation which meant that there were social dynamics to race that simply could not be removed. The Supreme Court believed that it could not be responsible for enforcing social equality and so allowed segregation to happen.
Find out more on Plessy v. Ferguson at brainly.com/question/24766692
#SPJ1
A cause it seems cool and I understand this so babababa ba sbab ababsbsbdbnd. Andbdbjd
Answer:
Southern states wanted to count their slave population toward representation. Southern states would get more delegates in The House of Representatives & have more electoral votes for the presidency. Northern states did not want the slave population counted.
Explanation:
Answer:
its from the book I had read few years ago
