<u>Editorial Essay</u>
<h2><u>Our folk musical instruments, our identity</u>
</h2>
As we know that the folk musical instruments are those instruments that represent the culture, caste, and society of a certain place. Each community has its own culture, rituals, and traditions which may be similar but most of them were different to a particular place. Nepal is rich in cultural diversity that is why different culture is found in Nepal. Our folk musical instruments are part of them which represent us and our identity.
Today's era is the era of science and technology, due to this person of our country are not giving interest to our culture and activities. they were influenced by western culture. They start to talk in English to Nepali people, they don't even say we have our dresses. let's take an example; Khin, Murali, and Jhyali are the common musical instruments of the Newar community living in Kathmandu valley and other cities of Nepal but we see few old Newars involved in it. These musical instruments indicate the Newari society in Kathmandu. Similarly, Yalamber is a popular musical instrument of the Kirats of eastern Nepal. Sarangi is the typical musical instrument for the Gandarbha community of the Kaski district. Ektare is used by the sages and ascetics only whereas Damphu is an essential musical instrument of Tamangs. Panchae Baja is played by Damai in the wedding ceremony. Thus, we can say that folk musical instruments represent us, our culture, our society, and give us our identity.
Our folk musical instruments give us our native identity, though the use of folk musical instruments is decreasing day by day. To preserve our identity, we need to Preserve our folk musical instruments, our culture, our tradition, and our rituals. we need to perform a cultural program. we need to aware people by educating them about the importance of Preserving our folk musical instruments. let's preserve our folk musical instruments and preserve our own identity.
I think it's Saxon, hope this helps.
The principle of federalism in the U.S. Constitution is best defined as "<span>A. the sharing of power between national and state governments". This was an incredibly important aspect of the Constitution since people didn't want the federal government to have too much power. </span>
The zone of proximal development is a term coined by Vygotsky to describe the gap between what children are capable of doing on their own and what they cannot.
He believed that violating this zone—either by helping kids with things they can do on their own or by not helping them sufficiently with challenging tasks—hinders cognitive development. In a perfect world, adults who interact with kids would initially take the majority of the initiative in problem-solving before eventually handing it off to the kids themselves. Social agents can communicate with children by using language, which is the fundamental form of interaction. Children's own language gradually becomes their main tool for intellectual development, first as speech-for-self that is produced out loud (private speech) to direct and control their own actions, and then as silent self-talk. This internalization process, which Vygostky defined as the act of using an inner-speech instrument of thought that was initially located outside of children, A lot of Vygotsky's theories have produced empirical predictions, and the majority of them have been confirmed.
learn more about Vygostky here:
brainly.com/question/29216821
#SPJ4
Answer:
The term 'anti-Kurdism' appears to have been first coined by Gérard Chaliand, who used it to describe anti-Kurdish sentiment in Iraq and Turkey during the mid- to late twentieth century.[1] Much anti-Kurdish sentiment is a result of fears surrounding Kurdish nationalist aspirations for an independent Kurdistan and in response to the ultra-nationalist ideologies promoted by the states which control Kurdistan.
Explanation:
